Mind Mix Radio Novosti Report: Ukraine parts 1 – 3

PT 3 Pending…

Mind Mix Radio presents a research report from Alexei Novosti – foreign correspondent coalition.  3 Part Report on the story of the conflict in the Ukraine, including the history of the region and the players involved.






YOUTUBE pt 1:  https://youtu.be/pMwRfLMdhdc

YOUTUBE pt 2:  https://youtu.be/pbU5gy6zN3s





  1. Background: Ukraine means borderlands.  The Ukraine borders Poland, Russia, Slovakia, Belarus, and Romania.  The Ukraine is the second largest state in Europe.  It is fabulously wealthy.


The history of the Ukraine is blood-drenched.  It was coveted by ancient Scythians, Persians, Sarmatians, and the Vikings.   In the middle Ages, Swedes, Poles, Lithuanians, Russians, Mongols and Turks coveted its incredibly rich lands with excellent soil, broad rivers, and sweeping fertile agricultural pasturages, complimented by vast treasures of iron, manganese, silver and gold.


In the 12Th century, Russia defeated the powerful Khazar Empire that held sway over the silk, spice and trade routes to China.  It established a powerful black sea naval base at Sebastopol, a coveted warm water port.  Russia and Poland exerted influence over the region for 400 years, keeping the Turks and the Muslims out of Europe.


During the 16Th century, The Ukraine was Polish and Lithuanian territory until Russia and other European powers partitioned Poland in the 18Th century.  Poland was never to reacquire its dominating influence in the Ukraine.


During the 19Th century, Russia, England, France, Sardinia, and Turkey fought a very nasty war over control of the Crimea.  Although Russia lost the war, England never really held sway over the Ukraine.


In the 20Th century, the Ukraine was the objective of communist agents attempting to foment revolution in Russia.  In 1905, Lenin, Stalin and other communist agents instigated a bloodbath in the Ukraine.  The communists massacred Volga Germans and other European minorities living in the Ukraine.  Many fled to Canada and the United States.


The Ukraine was fought over by Red and White armies during the October 1917 communist revolution and much blood was spilled by warring armies for control of the Ukraine.  The communists exerted brutal control of the Ukraine and began collectivizing its wealthy farms, ranches, steel, and coal mines in the Donbass area.


In 1932, Stalin decided to wipe out wealthy farmers and the Ukraine’s middle class.  The Soviet secret police and military conducted a reign of terror in the Ukraine that lasted until 1937.  Over 7 million people were murdered by Stalin.  Many died of famine, as the communists confiscated all the food, all of the farms, and agricultural machinery and farmlands.


In 1937 Stalin imprisoned thousands and executed thousands more in a massive purge.


During WII it was fought over by Germans and Russians, and native Ukrainians.  Horrendous losses were incurred by the warring armies.  Hitler made a bee line for the Crimea warm water ports and the Ukraine’s iron and manganese mines as necessary elements to drive his new order war machine.  Over 5 million Ukrainians lost their lives, including most of the Orthodox Jews.


Between WWI and WWII many ethnic Poles lived peacefully in the Ukraine until Hitler

invaded in 1941.


Few know that the Ukraine was targeted by Reinhardt Heydrich and the Nazi SD for destabilization in 1935.  Secret Nazi agents were inserted into the Ukraine to assess what blond and blue eyed ethnics were amendable to incorporation into an expanding Reich new order.  Nazi agents recruited many Ukrainians disaffected by Stalin and the communists.  A secret underground army was established in the Ukraine under control of Nazi agents.


Ultranationalist Ukrainian leader and war criminal, Stepan Bandera aligned with the German Nazis.  Bandera conducted ruthless ethnic cleansing campaigns in the Ukraine, ridding the land of Poles, Orthodox Jews, Gypsies and Romanian settlers.  Many Banderites joined the SS and were extensively used as counterinsurgency troops by the Nazis in the Ukraine.  Many of these Ukrainian Nazis were the core cadre of the murderous SS Einsatzgruppen killers that roamed the Ukraine at will, raping, burning, hanging and destroying all ethnics in the country.   Tens of thousands of ethnic Poles were massacred by the Banderites during WWII, leaving Poland with bitter lingering memories of Ukrainian perfidy.


In 1954, The Soviet Union unexpectedly relinquished direct control of the Ukraine, and gave it to the Ukrainian people to manage, but incorporated it as part of the Soviet Union.  Russia had developed major infrastructure and industrial projects in the Ukraine and ringed the Ukraine with strategic military bases.


The Ukraine asserted its Independence in 1991, after the collapse of the Soviet Union.  The Ukraine relinquished control of strategic weapons to Russia, but kept modern military bases and weapons plants for its own armed forces.


The collapse of the Soviet Union set off a scramble by Western powers, and a coterie of central banks to finance and restructure a modern Ukraine under the European Union.  Unfortunately, the Soviet collapse also attracted the attention of arch master criminal, convicted felon, Nazi war criminal and international speculator, George Soros.  Soros is a Rothschild agent and front man in the United States.


‘ PUTIN WANTS ALL OF THE UKRAINE’… President P. Poroshenko, Ukraine


  1. THE ORANGE REVOLUTION AND SOROS’ AGENDA. An analysis of Soros’ links, activities, causes, and investments post Cold War suggests that Rothschild and the Bank of England agent, George Soros is waging political and subversive warfare on Russia, the Ukraine, the Middle East and Europe by the following measures aimed at bringing Europe into a world order government and super state.  The EU is to be replaced by a European federation super state under control of globalist agents.   Soros’ agents used the following measures.


  • Creating political and economic chaos through massive illegal Muslim immigration-using unrestricted and illegal immigration to destroy state sovereignty, and to implode the social welfare system.


  • Wreaking financial chaos by attacking national currencies and degrading their worth. Imposing severe austerity measures in Greece and Spain, plunging those economies into ruin and creating thousands of unemployed and homeless people (robbing garbage cans and restaurants became a popular crime in Spain).


  • Buying political candidates to subvert a state’s: traditions, politics, culture by creating and funding riots, funding political stalking horses and subversion agents that do his bidding in promoting globalism and authoritarian socialism in education, the arts and national politics.


  • Prior to the Soviet dissolution, Soros set up several foundations (Open Society Foundation and The Renaissance Institute) to manage events in Eastern Europe. Soros admitted that foundation agents in conjunction with the US State Department occasioned revolution, and the fall of the Ukrainian government in a coup known as the Orange Revolution. The former, legitimately elected government of V. Vanukovych was deposed by neo Nazi personages fronting for Soros and by Ukrainian Nazi organizations serving as Zionist fronts (Right Sector, Dmitry Yarosh a Zionist agent).


  • Soros’ acknowledged that many of the wild demonstrators in the Euro-Maidan movement were his foundation employees and recruits trained by his numerous NGOs in destabilization measures. Soros boasts that his International Renaissance Foundation (IRF) and the Open Society Institute (OSI) funded many of the chaotic events in Eastern Europe during the early 1990s, and were responsible for the disastrous Arab Spring that caused the atrocious war in Syria, the fall of Libya, and Egypt to Muslim radicals and persistent turmoil in the Arab world.


  • The United States has military forces and equipment inside the Ukraine and props up neo-Fascist’s Pyotor Poroshenko’s government. The objective of the American presence in the Ukraine, Scandinavia, and in the Baltic States and Poland is to constrain Russia with a ring of powerful military bases holding strategic weapons aimed at Moscow.


Thus in summation, the West (The USA and the EU) has ringed Russia with powerful military weapons and bases by incorporating former Soviet states in the American led, financed and driven NATO military alliance, which now exerts tremendous influence in the Ukraine and has set the course for an apparent direct collision with Russia and Vladimir Putin.  Private actors fronting for globalist organizations and elites like George Soros orchestrated many of the boiling political eruptions in the Ukraine that appears to set the stage for a possible Third World War.  Moreover, in examining the military actions of the neo-Fascist inclined Poroshenko government with its American partners a new reality appears.  America and the EU are waging a genocidal war on separatist Ukrainians’ seeking political, economic, and cultural union with Russia.







  1. The Ukrainian Cauldron. After hundred of hours of watching films, documentaries and studying hundreds of articles about the Ukraine, some of the following salient facts are noteworthy for consideration.


Note: Genocide is the purposeful killing of an ethnic race by design based on their origins, politics, and social standing.  If the preponderant power kills a targeted population by famine, disease, by making them homeless, where they can die of exposure, it is still considered genocide.   The weapons don’t necessarily have to be bombs and bullets.  Famine is one of the best (See NSM 200, Henry Kissinger, 1974).


  1. MSM News Blackout. The American and European MSM have maintained an effective news blackout on issues in the Ukraine, such as war crimes committed by neo Nazi troops from the Azov battalion.


  1. Propaganda and Demonization. The American and European MSM use every occasion to characterize V.  Putin, the Russians and separatist Ukrainians wishing to secede from the Ukraine as (a.) criminals, (b.) terrorists, (c.) saboteurs meriting condemnation, delegitimization, and the death penalty.


  1. American Mindset. American officials arrogantly tend to perceive that the Russians do not count for much in the post Cold War era.  They were counting on a reset with Medevev as President and not Putin.  Bad mistake.  They keep reciting Russian aims at expanding empire with the conflict in Chechnya and in Georgia, while conveniently forgetting what happens in the Caucasus directly impacts Russian national security… just as much what happens in Mexico does with the US (we invaded Mexico in 1916 over security concerns with Pancho Villa).


  1. Media Control of News Events. Newsworthy events, such as George Soros intervention in the State Department, Soros’ formulation of American foreign policy obtained from DC Leaks and other sources show that Soros and his lieutenants in constant engagement with every actor in the Ukrainian crisis from the beginning… the leaks show that Americans and Soros intending to subvert Russian influence in the Ukraine, bringing Russia to its knees economically, and steering the Ukraine toward a neo Con model integration with Europe and eventually with global government.  Soros rejected a federalized Ukraine, something Putin was amendable to.  Soros’ hand in all of this was blacked out by the USG (US Government) and by the media, who knew full well how the game was playing out.


Note: The USG was confident it could win the propaganda war and influence Germany, Greece and others in the EU sympathetic to Moscow views by insisting that federalization of the Ukraine was bad, and wiping out the separatist movement was the correct answer.  Obviously, this view backfired as full scale civil war rages in the Ukraine.


Note: An examination of the details involving Soros’ conversations with US Ambassador Geoffrey Pyatt disclose a stunning development.  Ambassador Pyatt asks Soros what should be done in the Ukraine.  Who is the ambassador and who is running US foreign Policy… Washington or George Soros?  Soros’ reply is that Barrack Obama has been too soft on Russia and that a harder line is called for!


  1. Utilization of Weapons of Mass Destruction. The Ukrainian Armed Forces (UAF) upon notice of dissolution of the Donabass area from the Ukraine resulting in the formation of separatists political states (The Donbass and Luhansk People’s Republics) Kiev mobilized its army and  poured in heavy mechanized tank battalions with heavily armed mobile infantry, and began using weapons of mass destruction such as Multiple Launched Rocket Systems [MLRS], the powerful BM 21 Grad and BM 27 Ouragan strategic rockets against separatist militia, civilians, and residential areas in the Donbass region.


  1. Mass Casualties & Destruction of Infrastructure. Inspectors from the UN’s Office of Cooperation and Security in Europe (OCSE) estimates that since 2014, some 10,000 civilians, UAF soldiers and separatist militia have died in the raging conflict.  Separatist military formations have sustained casualties and the destruction of military equipment in bitter fighting characterized by ruthless urban combat scenarios, such as the terrible fighting at the Donetsk Airport.  However, an analysis of UAF targeting suggests that the emphasis of Kiev’s military campaigns against the separatists rests on causing civilian casualties, and public infrastructure destruction related to the quality and essentials of life.


(a) water mains

(b) schools

(c) electricity generators and power stations

(f) gas pipelines

(g) food stores

(h) train stations and airports and principal roads

(i) residential areas


This implies that FEAR and TERROR are constant companions of civilians in the Donbass area.  The random and sustained rocketing and shelling have caused many terrible civilian deaths and the loss of homes, cars, jobs, and apartments.  Many shocked civilians have fled to the Crimea, abroad, or to Russia as refugees.  This state of affairs has been almost totally ignored by the MSM (Interesting to note it is also ignored by the MSM European press and the UN).


Observations and analysis of sentiments obtained from emails, films, news reports, and statements from independent journalists, expatriates and travelers suggest that popular resistance to the neo-Fascist Kiev government is deep, bitter and sustained.




  1. The EU.  Many in the Donbass and Eastern Ukraine do not want anything to do with the EU. They feel the EU does not meet their cultural or ethnic interests, and it is dominated by America, Germany (their former bitter WWII enemy), and by France.  They have strong cultural, language and ethnic ties to Russia and want to be an autonomous entity of Russia under the Russian Federation.  Many of these people have strong family ties in Russia and go back and forth (like Mexican families in the US with Mexico).  They see Poroshenko and his government as fascists and as toadies of the US and George Soros.  In essence, Ukrainians in the East rejected Poroshenko as a US toady and his government as illegitimate.


“MAY GOD QUICKLY TAKE ME TO MY GRAVE.”   … homeless Ukrainian Babushka




Ukrainians in the Donbass and Donetsk bitterly remark to journalists that they hate Poroshenko and the Americans for destroying their homes and country.  Many are now refugees, traveling like gypsies and wandering around homeless on the back roads.  Russians and others have offered to help them, but they are a proud and stubborn lot.  A Babushka refused to let a journalist carry her shopping bag (it contained the salvage from her home).  She refused to let him carry it.


  1. Perceptions of Self and the Future, Personal Issues.  Many Ukrainians are simply bewildered and horrified at what has happened to their country.  They had a lot to look forward to.  Life after the collapse of the old USSR was improving constantly.  They had a good trade and working relationship with Russia and with most of Europe.  Investments from abroad were accelerating, creating jobs, and modernizing their infrastructure and industrial base.  However, deep political and economic forces were working in the background to wrest control of the Ukraine from its peoples. These forces aligned with the neo Con agenda and the Project for a New American Century aimed at  making America the preponderant and unipolar power in the post Cold War era.  Ukrainians realize that their country, its resources, and they as a people are caught in a tug of war between the post Cold War forces of globalization and independent self-determination.  Ukrainians are driven apart and remain divided by the following personal issues.


  1. Bitterness and Self-Determination. There is too much bitterness over the wanton killing, pillaging and senseless destruction of the Ukraine with mass weapons for any reconciliation.  Eastern Ukrainians and Russian ethnics want the fascist clique in Kiev, Poroshenko and the American arch criminal, George Soros tried for war crimes.  They wish to seek their own course and self-determination.  They have a right to do that under the UN Charter.


  1. War Crimes and Terrorism. The Kiev government and the Ukrainian Armed Forces see the separatists and those in the East as TERRORISTS meriting the death penalty and the destruction of their territory.  The UAF (Ukrop to the separatists) have committed many outrages, including documented executions of civilians and suspected pro-Russians.  Yet, separatist military forces are also guilty of abusing UAF prisoners in parading prisoners in public, exposing them to civilian retaliation, beating them up in public, and dumping UAF bodies in public squares (that has to stop!).


  1. Loathing of “The Other.” There are intense feelings of betrayal, hostility and outright hatred from both groups.  There is no effective cease-fire.  As soon as the sun goes down or the UN observers (OSCE inspectors) go around the corner, shooting and shelling begins, sometimes lasting all night.  Confidence building measures and the presence of peace keepers is noticeably absent in the conflict zone.


  1. The Future and Security. Many knowledgeable observers arguably suggest that Putin’s annexation of the Crimea was critical to destroying the post Cold War security apparatus, thus leading directly to a possible world war. What they ignore, is more basic facts-Russian interests and security in the entire region is strategic and non-negotiable.  Moscow is prepared to go to war if the West makes a move on the Crimea, considered critical to Russian national security.  Thus, the basis for gloomy expectations of a peaceful and prosperous future in the Ukraine as it remains a flashpoint for global war.


  1. The UN. The UN to most people in Eastern Ukraine is irrelevant.  They do not want integration with Europe as it means the loss of their cultural and ethnic identities.  They are very proud of their traditions and culture.  A recent documentary film depicted a Kuban Cossack, in Cossack dress wandering the roads with a cross, blessing all and giving water to homeless people.  He said prayers for the separatist militia units he met on the way.  Wandering minstrels and Orthodox devouts have a long and honored tradition in Russia and the Ukraine.  Recent documentary films show many of the beautiful Orthodox churches senselessly destroyed by shellfire.  Babushkas and grandpas were setting aside brick, wood, and mortar to rebuild them.


The UN’s Office of Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) sends inspectors to document shelling exchanges.  They interview people and photograph mounds of ruins and the newly dead.  But that is all they do.  There are no peacekeepers in the Ukraine.  The people in the conflict zones call the OSCE inspectors worthless flies sitting on a dead carcass.


  1. The EU and Ethnic Culture.  Ukrainians in the East do not want to integrate with Europe.  They constantly cite the loss of their traditions and culture.  That is what they live for…to be Ukrainians celebrating life-not to be vague citizens of some ill-defined super state that will likely treat them as second class citizens.  Moreover, they cite that linguistically and culturally they have links with Russians and that there are many ethnic Russian citizens in the Ukraine. They cite the need for an autonomous state linked to Russia economically and culturally, but with their own government (The United States’ federation principle).


  1. The USA.  Many Ukrainians have families in Canada and in the US (think Alberta and the Dakotas).  They are deeply upset over the USA’s support of a fascist clique in Kiev.  They feel outraged and betrayed by the American government (think Obama, Victoria Nuland, Secretary of State Clinton).  There are very bitter feelings from separatist militiamen that the “Ukrops” (a derogatory term for the Ukrainian Armed Forces-UAF) is getting massive US help to kill them and to destroy their country.  They are also very angry at the presence of Polish and American mercenaries training the UAF, or actively fighting against them.  That was emphasized by militia members in a number of interviews.  They bitterly added “what comes around goes around!”


III.  The Separatist Militia.  The militias in the Donbass region have amazed international observers.  Their members are not professional soldiers, but mostly miners, farmers, housewives, and tradesmen.  Observers snidely remarked that they would not last a minute going up against the Ukrainian Armed Forces.   They are now becoming a professional army in the making.  Many members are ethnic Russians with military backgrounds citing the need to help their Donbass Ukrainian brothers in a just cause and fight.  Some of these people quit their jobs to go to the Donbass region to join the militias.


Note: Some observations obtained from documentary films, press interviews, social media commentary about the separatist militia follows below.


  1. Unit Cohesion and Morale.  It is very high.  Militia members realize there will be casualties, wounded, and dead.  Despite being outgunned and forced to improvise and use some outmoded equipment, they are not dissuaded.  Many militia members cited that the Ukrainian Crisis is the beginning of WWIII and people in the West do not see it for what it is.  Militias honor their dead with memorials and salutes.  They also make every effort to retain a sense of humor and their humanity.


  1. Tactical Skills and Equipment.  The PKM machine gun, the AK rifle, the RPG7, and SVD sniper rifle are the weapons of choice.  Some outfits use the old WWII PTRS anti-tank guns. Uniforms and load bearing outfits are of very good quality, and of modern design.  They use camouflage of all types, but most are outfitted with camouflage uniforms matching the terrain (The Gorka mountain outfit is widely used).  They keep their weapons and outfights clean and in good repair.  They train in small unit tactics: ambushes, infiltration, flanking and patrolling.  They use GMRS and HAM type portable radios.  Militia members are skilled recoilless rifle shooters.  They use 82MM mortars, 57MM and 75MM recoilless rifles, LAWS, and RPGs as mobile artillery.  Antiaircraft guns were generally not seen.  Tanks, IFVs, and artillery were acquired from UAF stocks or supplied by Russia.  Some village militias use the older Mosin Nagant bolt action rifle, and the good semi-automatic SKS rifle.


  1. Individual Outfits, Communications. When combat is expected, militias only carry essentials.  They use the old Soviet M40 or later Cold War “cone head” helmets, or the more modern Kevlar renditions.  Generally, they limit loads to weapon, ammo, water and one or two day’s rations and IFAKs (first aid kits).  They use tarps, ponchos, dugouts, and ruins for shelter.  They use soft caps and “boonie” hats on patrols.  Scouts and snipers use “do rags” as headgear.  Snipers and scouts are seen in ‘bush rag” or in ghillie camo outfits.  Helmets are carried because of constant Grad Rocket or artillery bombardments.  Medics carry tourniquets, gauze pads, and anti-shock medication.  Stretchers are improvised by using ponchos and blankets.  When not in the field, many militia messes are provided by townsfolk supporters.  Militias were seen using cell phones, GMRS and HAM type portable radios. Some static positions used the old field phone system or runners for communications.


  1. Armor, LAWS, RPGs, Artillery.  Militia use BMPs, BTRs and Russian T-72 and Ukrainian T-64 tanks with upgraded tubes (125MM).  They praise the native T-64 highly and are devout users of the Russian BMP IFV.  The militiamen know how to work with armor and are constantly guarding the flanks of armor in urban settings.  Militia members carry a plethora of anti-armor weapons, usually American pattern LAWS and Russian RPGs. Much of the training in armor is provided in Russia.  Whether militia armored units have engaged in tank versus tank battles is unknown.  Militias recover damaged or knocked out tanks, IFVs, and either try to make repairs or salvage parts.


Artillery used by militias rests on the Soviet pattern D30 122MM divisional piece and some long-ranged 130 MM guns.  Whether militias have access to or use Grads (BM21 MLRS) is unknown.  Militias adopt individual 122MM pieces to support them.  They used these guns effectively in the Donetsk Airport battle.


  1. Training, Females, Sentiments.  Militia training is very intense.  Instructors actually use LIVE FIRE ROUNDS to stress important points in taking cover and using concealment.  Militia members train on firing ranges and assault courses.  Instructors appear to know their jobs and constantly rehearse their charges in deployments, the use of camouflage, cover and concealment, the use of supporting fires, marksmanship and in assault and defensive skills and tactics.  Many trainees appeared to be older males (some were grandfathers).


There are many women present in the militias.  Some of the women are snipers, tank or BMP drivers, or mortar gunners.  Some of the women lead men in battle and are highly regarded by the men.  Sex is not an issue with the militia-the best qualified people command regardless of sex or background.  Female trainees know they have a rough ordeal on their hands.  They try to civilize situations by baking and cooking for the men, and by singing songs, or reciting poetry.  Female militia cited the need to join their men as the fight was theirs too.  Many female militia members cited they hated war and filth, and wanted to return to their homes, jobs and families (the men did too).  There was a sense of deep bitterness and sadness, yet interwoven with optimism expressed by the militia.


Militia members interviewed by local and foreign press told the men with the UAF, especially the newly drafted young boys to go home, or to surrender to them.  They cited that if they surrendered they would spare their lives, otherwise, if not, then “too bad.”  Some of these youngsters captured by militia were sent home to their families by the militia.


  1. Snipers and Scouts, General Upkeep, Combat Loads.  Each militia fire team is equipped with a PKM machine gun and a sniper/scout or two with SVD sniper rifles and portable radios.  Snipers recon by fire and constantly use their excellent scopes and covert infiltration to scout the battlefield.  Snipers work very closely with machine gunners and militia artillery units.  Snipers are allowed independent authority to operate with the widest latitude.


During breaks in the fighting, militia train in tactics, clean weapons, prepare ammunition and magazines, and repair field equipment.  Their noise and light discipline is very good.  March formations and deployments are dependent on the terrain, the anticipated battle, and opposition.  Anyone who bunches up or screws up gets an immediate “rocket” from the sergeant.  Noncoms and officers contribute to the welfare of the men in these units by donating their own funds and equipment, or food to their men.  Relation between men and officers is informal but also respectful.  Militias do not salute officers.  They are expected to voice opinions and frequently do so.  It appears that militia members do their best to train, to become skilled soldiers, to respect and help each other and to protect the people they serve.


Militias are not used as heavy infantry.  They minimize combat loads to weapons, ammunition, and water.  They avoid overburdening themselves with heavy packs and the huge and heavy combat loads noted with American infantry in Afghanistan.  Militias carry basic combat loads of seven to nine AK magazines, and carry up to two RPG or light anti-tank weapon (LAW) rounds.  Militias use LAWs and RPGs as mobile artillery in close combat.  Militias make extensive use of “butt packs” and small backpacks to carry personal gear.  They carry several hand grenades (F1 pattern).  Only a few pistols or shotguns were observed used by the militias.   Boots are durable and of good quality with Vibram type soles.  Snipers use a lot of trail running shoes.  Militia use buses, personal autos, bicycles, motorbikes, IFVs, and tanks as transportation.  Most militia use unit markings and uniforms as required of combatants.


  1. Internationalization of the Separatist Militia. The Ukrainian crisis has attracted fighters from all over the world, eerily reminiscent of the Spanish civil war in the 1930s.   Americans, Poles, Brazilians, Balts, Englishmen Frenchmen, Georgians, Chechens, and Spaniards have joined the militias inspired by Ukrainian militia bravery and what they perceive is a just cause.


Conclusion.  The separatist militias appear to be determined and very hard fighters.  Contrary to professional views and expectations, they remain a major force on the battlefield.  They have inflicted significant casualties on the Ukrainian Armed Forces, routing better equipped enemy units and causing them to withdraw.  Militias in the Donbass are proud to serve.  Unit cohesion is outstanding.  Every effort is made to become better soldiers, to improve, and to take care of each other.  Militias make every effort to aid civilians: to help feed them, to provide basic first aid, to help evacuate them, and to protect them.  Relations between militia and civilians are outstanding.  The people revere them, support them, and aid them.  The militias are grateful for the people’s support and take care not to cause them trouble or to impose on them.  It appears that the separatist militias are evolving to becoming a highly competent professional army.  Militia member cite proudly that they did this mostly by themselves.  There were a few Russian advisers present, but the militias cited that the Russian army is in Russia, and not on the battlefield.  They admit that Russians angry over the conflict have volunteered to fight with them.  This invalidates the Kiev government’s claim that hundreds of thousands of Russian soldiers are ghosting in militia ranks.   Some militia units are guilty of mistreating UAF prisoners.  Militia commanders need to stop this immediately.  Finally, militia members’ views have soured and hardened.  Their inflexibility remains just as much an obstacle to peace as Kiev’s hard line does.  The deep bitterness in the Donbass region should motivate world leaders to search for a real cease-fire and for ways to end this atrocious war.


Propaganda is operative and at a high pitch demonizing each side as the intolerable other.  The West and the American MSM joins in a crusade depicting V. Putin and Russia as the chief cause of the crisis.  The MSM asserts that Putin had no right to annex the Crimea, ignoring facts regarding its long established links to Russia and the desire of Crimea’s ethnic Russians to join with Moscow.


Recent events indicate that the Russians and V.  Putin are losing patience with ever more dangerous Kiev provocations to use chemical weapons and air strikes in the Donbass.  Russian armor and infantry deployments to the Crimea and borders of the Ukraine have been noted and filmed.  Russia’s armed forces are now on a war fighting posture.  Kiev appears to be escalating tensions by sending significant armored units to the conflict’s borders.


The Ukrainian crisis remains a flashpoint for another world war.  Poroshenko’s government and the actions of the UAF deeply divide the Ukrainians.  Reconciliation does not appear possible.  Kiev is seen as a gang of outlaws doing globalist George Soros and the American neo Con’s bidding with little standing legitimacy.  Ukrainians in the Donbass and in the East see Kiev waging genocide on them.  They will never back down or retreat from their beliefs.  That is key to understanding them.  Their reverence for their traditions, language, and cultural heritage unites them as a people.  They do not want to integrate with Europe or with a world government.  They wish to remain Ukrainians.


Putin knows this, and while trying not to be provoked, he does appear limited in options to deal with the crisis by ever rising tensions.  He has put the West on notice that Russia will not back down in defending its long-term security, economic interests, and brothers in the Ukraine and in the Crimea.  Moreover, he now boldly asserts that the Americans lied to the world about the need for basing American missile assets in territory close to the Russian border.  The Americans declared that this was necessary to defend Europe from the Iranian nuclear and medium range missile threat.


Putin knows that those missiles can also be used offensively with nuclear weapons.  They now ring Russia with a flight time of only 18 minutes to Moscow.  Additionally, the Americans are basing nuclear weapons in Romania.  Putin asks the world why this is necessary.  He declares Russia has no designs on the West.  The Western media appears to avoid coverage of the crisis because the Ukrainian separatists are an embarrassing contradiction to elite globalists’ like George Soros and his minions driving forward the foundation of a new European super state and globalist world government.  The message given to the separatists is clear.  Integrate, follow our will, quit resisting, or be destroyed.  You amount to nothing in our designs.


Finally, there is little doubt that Kiev and Washington are engaging in a genocidal campaign to wipe the separatists out.  An analysis of the targets selected by the UAF supports contentions that they are striking civilians and life support essentials and not military targets.   Thus, civilians in the Donbass region are without power, food, shelter, water, and heat, and are being treated by their own government in Kiev as terrorists and enemy combatants-without regard for any standards of human decency, compassion, or the laws of war.


  1. Putin is the only leader on the world stage that has decried a Ukrainian genocide in the making and appears firmly determined to stop it.


Meanwhile, the world holds its breath as the clock ticks down to a razor’s edge between sanity and World War Three.










YOUTUBE pt 2:  https://youtu.be/pbU5gy6zN3s






Knowledgeable observers to the grave crisis now occurring in the Ukraine state the present war in the Ukraine is much more than a regional crisis between the West and Russia.  What is a stake is a new global post Cold War order modeled on the ancient Roman Imperial model.


Essentially, globalist forces aligned with neo Nazis and old Nazis in the West “Deep State” apparatus inserted in the West prior to and after WWII feel that conditions in the world at present are ripe for the surfacing of the Fourth Reich.  However, the driving force behind this movement, although inspired by German Nazism, is international fascism.  Transnational corporations controlled by international fascist blocs and groups are the real engine behind this movement.


Fascism and its stepbrother, Nazism are essentially parallel political and economic movements resting on hierarchical centralized authoritarian government.  In this context, the state is controlled by monopolistic corporate interests hidden in the background.  The state thus overrides any measure of individual liberty or rights, and controls all spheres of life through totalitarian economic and social controls.  This infers total control of liberty, economics, culture and the arts, political or individual expression, labor, and education-the spheres of life.  Essentially, citizens are slaves to corporate elites (think feudalism).  The Nazi version incorporated elements of racial superiority as determinant in relations with other cultures, ethnicities, and states.  Human beings declared or viewed as inferior under Nazism were classified as enemies of state and slated for extermination.


  1. The hidden Nazi Deep State. By 1943, German Nazis in Hitler’s Third Reich knew that the war was lost as the power of West aligned with the Soviet Union was too powerful to conquer militarily, especially as Hitler was engaged in a two front war.  Germany did not have enough manpower or resources to carry forth such a struggle.  German technology and weapons were excellent.  By 1943, the German Nazis had developed super tanks, Infrared sighting technology, advanced submarines, phased array radars, guided missiles, cruise missiles, excellent fighters, jet engines and jet propelled bombers.  Some sources suggest that they also developed a neutron bomb.


However, the Nazis realized that much of their advanced weapons technology was too little and too late to carry the war in their favor.  Thus, reluctantly, Hitler and his minions decided that the best solution was for the Nazis to surrender Germany, but not the Nazi party.  Contextually, kernels of the Nazi state/party and its related financial, intellectual, economic interests and military technology assets would covertly go underground; and infiltrate Western states in the North and in South America.  Meanwhile, they would develop even more advanced weapons, thought and mind control technologies associated with mass political and social controls, and refine the concept of the transnational corporation as an instrument of state and war, and wait for the opportune time to resurface in a New Reich Order.  Nazi think tank analysts suggested that this would take some 40 to 50 years.


  1. What is Fascism. Nazism and Fascism are economic based political orders.  The people do not control the state.  Authoritarian corporate and political party interests do.  Keep in mind that the Nazi party of Germany and the Fascist party of Italy were corporate constructs.  These corporate interests represented the military industrial complex, the financial sector and sectors associated with life sustaining industries: food, water, heating, shelter and clothing.  One of the key elements in understanding Fascism is that corporate entities are oligopolistic in nature.  That is, only a small number of key players’ usually elite families control the economy and national politics.    These families wield power in familial corporations exerting considerable influence in setting prices, economic policies, competitors, the legal apparatus, and the state bureaucratic architecture (The American Rockefeller, Mellon and the German Rothschild and Krupp family are excellent examples of vested families with enormous financial and political control).




  1. THE ORIGINS OF THE NAZI DEEP STATE. There is much more to understanding the way a government and its bureaucracies function than a casual surface inspection reveals.  Naïve or uninformed persons are under an illusion that government power is limited by law, or by a constitution, or by different branches of government formulated to pursue a specific purpose.  There are two main structures supporting a Deep State notion of government.


  1. Private Sector Elements. In actuality, unelected bureaucrats, contractors, powerful corporations in the background, and elitist organizations all bring to bear power and influence that can exert enormous pressure to favor hidden interests in politics or the economy despite constraints of transparency and law, public policy, or state architecture. The significance of this is that the true nature of government, the power of unelected forces in the bureaucracy, the nature and the objective of powerful players behind the scenes are hidden from the casual observer, or trusting citizen.  In essence, this apparatus of economic and political control is a parallel and shadow government.  It is the real power residing in unelected persons, who actually control state policy and really run the government-the so-called Deep State.


Presidents, members of Congress, academics, public policy advocates, true believers in Constitutional and limited government know this and dare not cross the divide between nominal government and the minions of the Deep State.  A president who offends players hidden in the Deep State can be removed from office by withdrawing campaign funding, political support, by assassination, or by a contrived moral scandal.


In order for a Deep State shadow government to operate, the military and the police must be co-opted to the forces controlling the Deep State.  The outcome of a Deep State, is that this hidden force in beyond popular political influence, or control, beyond the reach of the press or public opinion, and ultimately the law.   Essentially, it serves itself and not the public.


How was the Deep State realized, how did it come to control so much of American and Western politics and the national economies of Europe and the United States?


The answer to those questions resides in the appearance, span of reach, and power of the 19Th century American ROBBER BARONS and the British Imperial Control system.  For example, the British East India Company, a private corporation controlled much of the world’s international trade, the civil service and government of India, the trade in slaves and Opium, and a vast conglomeration of peoples ranging from India to China, to Pacific Rim states.  The corporation had its own military and naval forces, its own civil service and reported to a board of directors representing British elites-not the British people.  Moreover, it must be understood that Nazism, or Fascism is not a local force.  It is global in scope, reach, and outlook.


Consequently, a compelling argument can be made that the origin of the modern political Deep State rests with British and American imperialism and not Germany.  All that the German Nazis did was to refine these concepts and to expand on them.  In effect, German Nazi agents inserted into America prior to WWII were hard at work with Nazi American partners laying the foundation for hidden Nazi controls to dominate vast segments of the American political economy.  These Nazi agents were inserted into the mainstream fabric of American life.  Elite banking concerns, such as the Bush family controlled Union Bank, the eminent law firm, Sullivan and Cromwell, and American corporations, like General Aniline and Dye, the Sperry Gyroscope Company, General Electric, Ford Motor Company, and International Telephone and Telegraph were infiltrated and corrupted to align with Nazi views on the political economy.  In Britain, the same Fascist forces were at work inside elite British corporations such as the Hambro consortium of banks, Vickers/Armstrong, Royal Dutch Shell, and the Bank of England.  These American and British corporate forces aligned with Swiss (The Bank of International Settlements-BIS), and German corporations were the true forces of international Fascism or Nazism-take your pick.


There is another element and source of Deep State power, that most Americans do not know about that supports this Fascist troika of power resting on (1) the Police, (2) the military, (3) contractors and corporations in the military/industrial complex.


  1. The Official Continuity of Government (COG). The COG apparatus or the Continuity of Government structures were enacted during the Cold War to maintain government continuity and survivability in case of a nuclear war and its aftermath.  The COG team was conceived to rest on a cadre of politicians who would act in the name of the President, certain Congressmen, designated military officers and appointed bureaucrats to evacuate American cities, to mobilize the remnant military, and to deliver a counterstrike against the Soviet Union.  That never happened.  Instead, President George Bush in the wake of the terrorist strike on America in September 9/11 enacted a full-time, permanent COG bureaucracy manned by unelected shadow government functionaries.  President Obama expanded this construct beyond the reach of the Bush Administration.  Today, COG is fully funded and has expanded its reach of power beyond law and Constitutional strictures.


These two unlawful and Unconstitutional sources of power have joined forces and now rule America from behind the scenes.  The National Security Council, the Office of National Intelligence, the Department of Homeland Security, and the Council on Foreign Relations are the visible heads of this powerful consortium.  In effect, executive orders and not the Constitution are determinant in making policy and implemented Unconstitutional law.  All executive orders appear predicated on some vague or future national emergency.


  1. The Nazi Enabling Act. This closely parallels the German Nazi Enabling Act, passed by the German Reichstag as soon as Hitler took power.  This Act gave the fuhrer unlimited power and rule by decree.  Within a year the German legislature was dead and all law emanated from one person, Adolph Hitler.  Executive orders were enforced by the Nazi Party police (all police, lawyers, and judges were members of the Nazi party), and intelligence agencies, the Gestapo (Internal security) and the SS Sicherheitsdinst (the SD, external or foreign security).  Nazi judges tried suspects in secret courts.  The Gestapo approved defense lawyer selection.  The Gestapo could withhold evidence and witnesses from jurists.  If this sounds familiar, it is because the American NDAA is based on the Nazi legal empowering construct giving the state almost unlimited power over American citizens (The Enabling Act is quite similar to the American National Defense Authorization Act, NDAA).


III. THE INFILTRATION OF FASCIST/NAZI AGENTS INTO AMERICA.  This began prior to Hitler’s rise and the emergence of Nazi Germany.  It began in earnest with the rise of the Fascist party and Dictator Benito Mussolini in the 1920s, thus fascism as we know it predates Nazism.  Under this ideology applied to America, powerful American corporations in banking, defense, and the armaments and transportation sector funded Mussolini and provided technology for his military forces.  Thus, fascist Deep State agents were already in place when Hitler surfaced in Germany.  Modern political ideologies need a source of financing to implement totalitarian controls on a state and its people.  Central banks in Europe and the American Federal Reserve consortium served this function perfectly in Europe and in America, especially during the 1930s.


After World War II, the victor nations over Nazi Germany apportioned German technology, industrial advances and Nazi technicians among themselves.  Accordingly, German weapons and technology scientists, the administrators of huge Nazi state industrial complexes (i.e. KRUPP, SIEMENS, IG FARBEN, ORGANIZATION TODT), engineers, and experts in military and police tactics, the formulators of counter-insurgency warfare doctrine, mass murder and execution constructs, prison camps, and intelligence specialists were imported in vast numbers into America and emplaced in the US military, US police forces, and in America academia (the founding cadre of American Special Forces were Nazi SS Einsatzkommandos).


The wartime Nazi Gestapo and Sicherheitsdinst (SD) operatives were brought to America and hidden within the FBI and the CIA.  Nazi SS General Reinhardt Gehlen, who was in charge of German intelligence on the Eastern Front set up the CIA based on Nazi principles.


Nazi scientists, mass murder technicians, and SS counterinsurgency specialists were brought into America under hidden CIA run operations, such as Operation Paperclip and so on.  The German Nazis diverted and hid enormous sums of money acquired from looting captive nations and wealthy Jews into Swiss banks aligned with Nazi Germany during WWII.  Many Nazi war criminals were given free passes and transported by the US military or by Nazi underground organizations to South America and even to the USA, where they were given new identities and assistance by Nazis already in place in the USA or South America.


Thus, the technology developed by Nazi Germany, the technicians, the administrators, the military and intelligence personnel, the scientists, the paper pushers and formulators of Nazi or Fascist ideology were all hidden in place mostly in the Americas for a future rise of a 4th Reich- at the opportune time.  The Fourth Reich is arguably the so-called New World Order that Hitler and his acolytes conceived of and discussed in Mein Kampf and My New Order prior to WWII.


  1. THE NEW REICH ORDER. It is at once political, racist, and geopolitical in nature. It conceives of a one world Fascist government and oligopoly based economic control system, a state run religion, and a global military.  In this schema the following are to be eliminated.


  • Political opponents and dissidents
  • Religious adherents of Judaism or Christianity
  • Republicans and Constitutionalists
  • Communists
  • Nations deemed overpopulated by “useless eaters.”
  • The Slavic race, Russia and freedom loving Slavs
  • America and freedom loving Americans
  • Blacks in African nations with geostrategic mineral resources


Essentially, the New World Order construct is nothing more than the Old World Order view of Fascist sociopolitical control refined by technology.  This concept has ancient roots resting in the Roman Empire.  It is no coincidence that the Roman icon of twin Fasces came to represent the fascist order in Mussolini’s Italy.  You see the twin FASCES icons in Congress and on American coins.  The fasces represent the power of the Imperial magistrate.  Most Americans have no idea of what they mean.


  1. THE NEW WORLD ORDER-FASCIST OR COMMUNIST? The trajectory of the New World Order political and economic system surfaced after the end of the Cold War and the collapse of the Soviet Union.  Arguably, this was no accident.  The demise of the Soviet system was deliberate.  Arguably, the old USSR as a political control and economic construct had served its purpose.  The Cold War was a false narrative and deception.  Its purpose, experimental in nature was to ascertain what political philosophy and economy was best to a futuristic world, and what technology was needed to control people and their thoughts.


Under this schema, the Russian communist state was an experiment as much as the fascist Italian and Nazi states had been.  Please keep in mind that socialism implies that the economic means of production and wealth generation are in the hands of the state and not the people.  What it actually means is that corporate elites in industry and banking really own the state and lend it money at usurious rates to operate.


Note:  When Hilary Clinton said that Assad in Syria needed to step aside as democracy was coming to Syria, I am sure Assad, Putin and Clinton knew full well that what she really meant was that FASCISM and Rothschild central bank was coming to Syria.


To reiterate, it is important to understand that contextually, the aim and outcome of this massive global socio political and economic system now surfacing in the 21St century implies that a decision has been made in selecting the political ideology and economic system that is to serve the hidden masters in a future global world under their direct control (the controllers plan ahead in 50 to 100 year cycles i. e, Stanford Research Institute, (SRI), Tavistock Research Institute, and the RAND Corporation.  See The Committee of 300; Wall Street and Hitler, Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution for more information).  The results of the experiment were in.  Communism failed economically, but thrived as an ideology to control the masses.  Fascism and its attendant control systems thrived.  Thus, what we are seeing today is a meld between fascism and communism… the so-called Third Way.  Unfortunately, for humanity, the worst aspects of the police state systems relevant to fascism and communism have been retained.


Adolf Hitler elaborated in his private conversations that Soviet communism was inefficient and ineffective as a global economic system, but that it was perfect as a police state apparatus).  It lacked vitality, creativity, and flexibility.  He was a powerful advocate of the fascist economic family trust system (See Stalin and Hitler, Parallel Lives, Alan Bullock).  However, Hitler incorporated several developments by the Soviet communists, who had by the 1920s perfected the mechanics of a powerful secret police system.  Hitler based his SS, the secret political police (The Gestapo), and the Nazi intelligence agencies on the Soviet and Venetian Jesuit models.  In retrospect, I believe Hitler (no fool) was right in characterizing communist economics as uninspired muddle.


It would be correct to assume that Stalin, Mussolini, and Hitler were New World Order agents, controlled and financed by an exterior funding source.  This infers that a coterie of central banks funded and financed all of these actors in their respective spheres of influence.   What banking institution has such an enormous power?  An examination of the roles, functions, and the de facto power of various state central banks leads to only one conclusion… The Rothschild financial consortium of central banks was the titular head of this demonic force that unleashed Hitler, Mussolini, Mao, (Mao too?  Mao was funded by operatives of Yale University-Skull and Bones) and Stalin on the world.


Ah, but that is conspiracy theory you say.  Really?  If you know where to look and care to read documents prepared by their own “Illuminated” theoreticians, you will see the grand design with your own two eyes (You might read up on how the German, Baron Adolph Knigge, an Illuminist and the Jacobins targeted the French monarchy in the 18Th century.  Knigge fell out with Weishaupt and suspected he was a Jesuit front man).


Note:  It is interesting to examine The Order of the Perfectibilists and the background of the Bavarian Illuminati.  Several of them including the founder, Adam Weisshaupt were disbarred Jesuit priests.




An examination of documents, money transfers, reminiscences, memoirs of persons affiliated with the global communist and fascist movements since the 1920s discloses that powerful banking institutions financed Hitler, Mussolini and Josef Stalin.  Most of them were related to the Rothschild consortium.  Among these were:


  1. The Union Banking Corporation in the USA (Harriman and Bush family)
  2. The Warburg Bank of Hamburg, Germany (the Warburg family of the USA and Germany)
  3. The Schroeder Bank of Germany
  4. The Kuhn Loeb Bank in the USA
  5. The Bank of England (Rothschild)
  6. The Jacob Schiff bank (USA)
  7. Lazar Frères’ (France)
  8. Guaranty Trust, JP Morgan (USA)


Are capitalist banks funding the source of their own destruction by financing communist and hard-core socialist revolutionaries?  It’s more complicated than that, and you have to look deeper.  In essence, capitalist banks and other financial institutions funded revolutionaries to bring down targeted states and societies so they could impose their own financial and political controls on these states.   End of story.  To better understand issues in the New World Order schema and in the Ukraine, it’s necessary to look at some determinants and political trajectories associated with social engineering and progressivism.


  1. The Economic Determinants of State Power. Under communism, capitalism is a monopoly power exercised by a state bank that controls the government offices, and the social welfare and economic system. It is hidden.  You cannot see it at work.  Under fascism, capitalist banks held by certain oligarchs own the corporations that control the politicians and the government.  Under this system there is a little more transparency, but not much. The end result is pretty much the same.  The operative mechanism is concentrated political and financial power in the hands of bankers… Thus, the ultimate power under these ideologies is in the hands of bankers.  The people are nothing more than expendable assets and are treated as such.


  • Banks = concentrated financial power
  • Banks loan money at interest = quick accumulation of wealth by compound interest
  • Banks loan money to corporations to use as liquid operating capital
  • Corporations buy or finance politicians, who mandate corporate control of selected industries = fascism = authoritarian, hierarchical government = means of production held by selected corporations = corporate control of the state
  • Banks are corporations.  They lend money to governments.  Governments then securitize the bank debt by assigning the debt to the income of people, and to resources that can be exploited to generate wealth.  The means of production are held by the government = communism = monopoly capitalism = hierarchical authoritarian control = corporate control of the state
  • The state legitimizes the corporation as a lawful and legal construct


Therefore, a close examination of the Soviet Union, Fascist Italy, Nazi Germany, and Progressive America from Taft to Franklin Roosevelt discloses essentially the same structures at work.


  • authoritarian government, limits on personal freedoms
  •  pervasive secret police, strict social controls,
  • the imposition of Imperialism abroad, and diminished economic opportunity for most citizens at home, including limited upward mobility
  • moral degeneracy (we will return to demoralization in a moment).


  1. Progressivism, & Social Engineering. Is America really “Progressive” centered or is it, capitalist or socialist inclined?  When you examine Wilson’s presidency and his authoritarian police controls, his avowed progressive ideology, the jailing of dissidents and his interventions in Mexico and elsewhere, one tends to get confused.  Moreover his predecessors, Taft and Teddy Roosevelt’s so-called progressive ideology and economics, and their use of American imperial force further obscure the issue.


Thus we have a conflicted and muddled answer.  We see laissez-faire capitalist economics combined with socialist reform strictures aimed at curbing capitalist abuses, female suffrage, combined with a police state mentality combined with an Imperialist based foreign policy.  What is determinant in finding an answer in wading through the muddle is who controls the government, the means of production and the politicians?


The early American Progressive movement had many laudable goals and honorable aspirations to reform the raw abuses of capitalism and monopoly money power.  However, it fell away from its path, and like many other political movements in America, became corrupted.  “Carry a Big Stick” Progressive, Teddy Roosevelt championed American power all over the world.  Taft intervened in Cuba and in the Philippines.  Wilson intervened with US military force in Mexico, Haiti, the Dominican Republic, and in the conflict raging in Europe.


Moreover, it appears that so-called progressives had no conflict with American imperialism.  They perceived it as uplifting and beneficial to the improvement of world society (consider improvements in society gleaned through social engineering).  Consequently progressivism fused raw Imperialism and altruistic social justice tenets into a weird morphology of a helping hand combined with a bayonet.  American presidents during times of national emergency nationalized or socialized entire industries (clearly a socialist measure).  Today, we have executive orders ready for the president to pick and choose from related to implementing the same measures.


So, if we assume that socialism infers that the means of production are controlled by the state (i.e. supposedly the state are the people) does it imply that America is a socialist state?  When you see that the state in actuality, is controlled behind the scenes by a corporate oligarchy in selected industries, and that a central bank exists to finance national debt, you can only draw one conclusion.  America, in essence, today has evolved from the Robber Baron era to become a neo FASCIST STATE.   This evolution has grave implications for the world.  It has grave implications for the people in the Ukraine.


  1. Social Engineering. This is a process whereby defects in society are perceived to eliminated by applications of technology to solve problems afflicting society, such as-


  • drug addiction
  • teen-age pregnancy
  • pornography
  • welfare
  • youth dissipation
  • youth gangs
  • alcoholism
  • poverty


Thus, teen-age pregnancies might be reduced or eliminated by a combination of strong laws aimed at incarcerating those responsible for impregnating young females, by sex education in school, by handing out prophylactics to youth.  Arguably the Soviet communists and the German Nazi socialists used many of the social engineering principles to change their societies.  The Soviets used the firing squad to eliminate those considered dregs on society and useless eaters.  The Nazis used the guillotine and the gas chambers to eliminate useless eaters, to purify their race from abominations and the physically or mentally disabled.  America used the knife and electricity to sterilize undesirable females and wipe the brains of addled people.  The outcome was incarcerations and the use of force in the elimination of persons who were perceived as detrimental to society and involved the cost of money in providing care for them… engineering.


  1. The End Result. Today, “progressive” is a code word for an authoritarian socialist inclined state-communist, Nazi or fascist… the end result is the same.  The citizenry, the institutions of government: justice, education, and the military are in the hands of socialist ideologues employed by the state.


Looking further, we see that Roosevelt’s social security construct, his progressive income tax structure, his organizations controlling commodities and fixing prices for goods and services, the transfer of lands to national parks and forests (essentially state land banks held in trust for the so-called people), the industrial nationalization board, the empowerment of the FBI under Hoover, and his unleashing of the FBI on Americans-all bear the hallmarks of a socialist state!  When you are too close to the problem, it is hard to see it for what it is…


To the central bank consortium operating behind the scenes, it didn’t really matter.  They loved communism, fascism, or Nazism as it gave their institutions almost total power in the states that they controlled.  The end result was the same under any of these political economies.


What this infers, is that powerful Ashkenazi Jewish banks under Rothschild banking control financed Hitler, Mussolini and Josef Stalin, and Mao.  The main purpose was to insure the destruction of Germany, most of Europe and Russia, the rise of the United States and to lay the foundations for a new fascist world order under the auspices of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and the rise of a fascist inclined European super state aiming at the integration of Europe-The European Union.  The destruction of Europe during WWII led to enormous profit taking by banks engaged in furnishing loans to rebuild European infrastructure.


  1. THE WORLD BANK AND THE IMF. Today, one of the main funding sources of states rests with the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is controlled by the US Treasury aligned with the Rothschild and Rockefeller controlled Federal Reserve bank (The Federal Reserve Bank is a private bank.  There is nothing federal about it).  What these organizations do is aim at making populations debt slaves to the central banks.  Yes, that is right…they create and impose DEBT on the peoples of the world.


Therefore, if the Ukraine seeks capital beyond what can be acquired by taxation to pay for its social welfare system, for its industrial development, to expand or modernize its military, or to develop new farming grounds in say Zaporozhe Oblast, the President goes to the central bank for loans that are securitized by making the Ukraine’s people and their resources collateral for the bank.  The loans are negotiable on the open market and the Ukraine’s debt can be traded, bought and sold on foreign exchanges like any other commodity (God help you if you fall into the hands of a criminal speculator like George Soros).


  1. The debt imposed on the citizenry is usurious. That is, Ukrainians must now pay compound interest on the debt.  That is cumulative and once that happens, the debt is almost impossible to pay off.  So, what does the central bank do when payments fall behind schedule or when the Ukraine cannot meets its debt obligations?


  1. Austerity Measures. Aha, now we come to crux of the matter.  Generally, very bad things are going to happen to the Ukrainian people (we have seen this over and over since the late 19Th century).  The bankers impose strict austerity on the people.  This implies reducing them to poverty.  Taxes on everything go way up.  Pensions are seized, private bank accounts, negotiable instruments held by private citizens, gold, silver, and privately held land are seized by the state at the request of the bankers and suddenly, Ukrainians are impoverished (I might add permanently so).


This usually results in social and political chaos and severe economic dislocations.  No matter, the bankers will remove the government, impose a new and stricter one, or send in the UN’s peacekeepers to maintain order.  Famine, disease, alcoholism and drug addictions suddenly rise along with the suicide rate.


People appear apathetic and hopeless.  Good.  That means the bankers have won.  Now they really got you, especially when you get addicted to alcohol, and hard drugs.  Social chaos, diminished productivity, hopelessness, increased crime rates are all just a cost of doing business to the central bankers.  In fact, they profit when you as a new criminal go to a privately owned prison and work in profit-making prison industries as a new slave laborer.







VII.  GEORGE SOROS AND THE UKRAINE.  The Orange Revolution and Euro/ Maidan political movement happened in the Ukraine.  It was financed and sponsored by George Soros and his institutions structured as NGOS, ostensibly as help measures for Russia and the Ukraine.


  • The Open Society Foundation
  • The Renaissance Institute


Soros is an avowed social engineer, espousing the ideas of Karl Popper.  He is a Nazi war criminal who sold his fellow Hungarian Jews to the Gestapo.  He expresses no remorse for this (“somebody would have done it”).  He thinks he is a man made God.  He believes he can change the world because he is God.  Soros believes in globalism.  A global economy thus requires a global government.   He says a collective of financial interests (does not identify them) requires the elimination of state sovereignty and the destruction of the old world edifices before we can progress toward the new (does not say how this is to be done and what they are).  Soros is also a convicted felon and arch criminal engaging in currency speculation, or in ruining the values of world monetary systems for his personal profit.


Thus, Soros and his NGOs were already in place in the Ukraine, before the current crisis scouting recruits for his messianic new world global order ideology.  The Open Society Foundation was set up to change Eastern Europe and the former Soviet States to his way of thinking.  Let’s take a look at his way of thinking.


  1. Background. Within the last two years, astute observers, police, and intelligence agents have noted the insertion of Billionaire George Soros, his philanthropies and NGOs into Europe’s massive and illegal Islamic invasion of the European continent.


Moreover, it appears the USA, and NATO ally Turkey are making moves to insert themselves into Russia’s sphere of influence in Eastern Europe.


  • The US has military forces in the Ukraine aimed at constraining Russia
  • Evidence of Turkish and US complicity in destabilizing the Ukraine to affect Russia and to move on the Crimea is apparent.  The Poroshenko government seeks union with the EU and NATO, which is grounds for war in Russia.
  • The Crimea commands the Ukraine.  The Ukraine and Crimea are militarily, economically and geostrategically significant to Russia due to the warm water port at Sebastopol, and the Ukraine’s ability to supply energy reserves to Europe, and for its food distribution markets and networks to Europe and to the world.
  • Russian Naval Forces in the Crimea commands the Black Sea.  The Crimea is important to Russia as it is its only warm water port located at Sebastopol since the 1700s.
  • The Crimea is the gateway to Euroasia.  Moreover, military power can be aimed at Poland, the Ukraine, and Russia, and at Central Europe from the Crimea.
  • During the Middle-Ages, Crimean Tartars, a Turkish Islamic warrior group held sway over Poland, Southern Russia and Eastern Europe, conducting long-range slave raids.  The Crimea became a powerful Islamic center.  This center committed depredations in Russia and in Poland.
  • Today, some Islamic residents have returned to the Crimea, but most of the population seeks reunification with Russia.
  • Islam has a vested interest in the Ukraine and Poland as Poland, and the Lithuanian Commonwealth were the apogee of Muslim penetrations into Europe.   Poland fought two brutal wars in the late 1600s against the Ottoman Turks, defeating them decisively and then fought another brutal battle against the Ottomans at the gates of Vienna in 1684, defeating the Ottomans.
  • Ottoman methods of conquest of Southern Europe included posing as allies of the desired state to be conquered, and then invaded in force.


  1. Soros Admits to Funding the 21St Century Islamic Invasion. Soros international philanthropies and NGOs, such as the Open Society Foundation appear to be furthering illegal immigration and subversive warfare against Europe in a two part strategy to subsume the West to establish a global world order.  Soros says a global order is necessary to stabilize the world and every means possible is justified.  Yet his actions in the Ukraine have reduced the Ukraine to massive chaos, civil war, and are resulting in destabilizing turmoil in Poland, Scandinavia, Hungary, Germany, and Scandinavia and in the United States (Think Occupy Wall Street and his funding of Black Lives Matter).


Soros gloats over the chaos caused by the Muslim illegal immigration.  Moreover, he blames V. Putin for causing the circumstances involving the Ukraine in civil war.  He blames Russia for its massive involvement in Syria as another cause for the European crisis.  He cites this as one main cause of the dispersion of Syrian refugees to Europe.  Putin and Russia recognizing the danger inherent in Soros’ NGOs kicked him and them out of Russia.  Russia has also issued an international arrest warrant for Soros.


  1. Soros Runs the Ukraine and American Foreign Policy. A recent hack obtained by DC Leaks of Soros involvement with American State Department official, Victoria Nuland and US Ambassador to the Ukraine; Geoffrey Pyatt discloses that Soros formulated policy for Barack Obama and the US Ambassador to pursue.  Some of the talking points in the recent hack reveal Soros’ views that Obama was too soft on the Ukraine and the lethal force and more severe measures were called for to deal with the rebels.   Soros elaborated in several confidential papers as follows:


  • The Ukrainian government was corrupt and for “democratization” to work, it had to sink to the lowest levels.
  • Poroshenko’s cronies had to stop taking payoffs.
  • Severe austerity measures were called for.
  • The separatists had to be dealt with by lethal force.
  • Poroshenko and the EU had to forestall Putin’s brilliant diplomacy and countermeasures.
  • The Ukraine’s industry and agriculture had to be opened to the West
  • NATO units and the American military were the main tasking elements in training the Ukrainian military.
  • The Ukrainian military and Poroshenko were to use the cease fire to build military power.
  • Poroshenko’s government needed the services of a professional PR firm to spin the story to the world.
  • Additional severe sanctions should be imposed on Russia for meddling in Ukrainian affairs (apparently in US views, Russia has no interests, or rights in the Ukraine, or the Crimea despite a 400 year long history and that many ethnic Russians still live there).
  • Federalization under Russia was out. No efforts were to be spared to counter any Russian federalization initiative and to discourage Germany’s Merkel and France’s Hollande from conceding that this could be a viable solution.


Thus, George Soros, a private citizen with BILLIONS, and not the US Congress, the US State Department, or the American President was formulating US Policy for the American ambassador to the Ukraine, Geoffrey Pyott to follow!  This implies that Soros and his cabal behind the scenes were the primary actors and that the American Government were stooges.  It is also clear that Soros aimed at destabilizing Russia through Ukrainian turmoil.  Soros bears responsibility for putting into motion the train of events that ruined the Donbass region and caused numerous deaths.


VIII. THE RISE OF THE TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATION AND THE VULTURES IN THE UKRAINE.  An examination of documents and communiqués put out by mega corporations discloses some very disquieting information about their aims in the Ukraine.


  1. The Corporate Players. Mega corporations, such as John Deere, Dow Chemical, Monsanto and a collective of Rockefeller energy firms want to exploit the Ukraine for personal profit.


  • Monsanto and Dow want to sow GMO crops in the Ukraine, existing law banning their use.
  • Monsanto and Dow, and other US firms want Ukrainian law banning the sale of private land to foreign corporations overturned and are lobbying Kiev to do so.
  • John Deere wants a major position in the Ukraine so it can sell farm machinery to farmers.
  • The US energy consortium wants to exploit Ukraine’s coal, gas and shale deposits for their profit.
  • Transnational corporations appear to be applying pressure on Washington to isolate Russia economically, politically and culturally. The establishment’s spin masters have conducted an ugly demonization campaign against V. Putin and Russia’s legitimate interests in the world.
  • The corporate vultures aim at dismantling the industrial power base in the Donbass region, replacing it with their own venues, and want open and favorable access to Ukraine’s agriculture. This implies that the Ukrainians are to loose their primary position in their own native industries to the vultures waiting to swoop in.
  • Monsanto wants to move ahead with its $140 Mn seed processing plant and bans lifted on pesticides and GMO crops as does Dow Chemical.
  • If the vultures prevail in the Ukraine, which has Europe’s largest agricultural base (outside of Russia), then Monsanto and other predatory corporations stand to gain almost unlimited control over the Ukraine’s resources. It appears the vultures are using the hardships imposed by the civil war to squeeze the necessary power levers to gain access to family land held in small plots and for Kiev to concede to sell its large reserves of land to the West.
  • Reduced to essentials, Soros and the West occasioned the war in the Ukraine as a land grab to gain control over the Ukraine, its peoples, and resources.



The insanity of all of this rests in that the New World Order advocates have given the people of the world an outline of what they intend to do.  You can find their intentions clearly exposed in the writings of New World Order authors, like Aldous and Julian Huxley, Adolf Hitler, H.G. Wells, George Orwell and in countless films depicting a lugubrious and mostly dystopian world, such as Soylent Green, The Hunger Games, A Clockwork Orange, The Bond series, the Bourne series, Blade Runner and so on.


Ah, but you say “that is just Hollywood.”  You might not be so flippant when I expose the rise of Venice and how certain oligarchs of Ashkenazi Khazar origin in the Middle Ages came to dominate the publishing world.  Venice’s Ashkenazi Jewish brethren took over the newspapers, the main American and continental publishing houses and Hollywood.  That’s right, the Ashkenazi brotherhood in the Illuminati originating from Venice control the world’s mainstream media, radio, book publishing and films.  They also control the world’s central banks and politicians, like those now in power in the Ukraine, Europe, and in the United States.


In summation, a compelling argument can be made that the conditions we are seeing in the 21St century-surfacing today in Syria and other areas of the Middle East, and in the Ukraine in Eastern Europe all had their origins established in the 20th century rise of authoritarian socialist regimes.  However, it goes back much further than that-all the way to ancient Babylon and the rise of Venice.


To better understand the historical, financial and geopolitical forces operative in the current Ukraine crises, we need to take a look at the Khazarian Empire, the Russian Tsars, and the rise of Venice and how the Venetian city state relates to the Ukraine.


  1. THE RISE OF VENISE AND OLIGHARCHY. Webster Tarpley and other eminent researchers, such as Carol Quigley, and Charles Higham have traced the power of this hidden consortium dedicated to global imperial rule all the way back to ancient Egypt, Rome, and Venice and feudalistic Europe.


The New World Order princes, today, claim descent from the powerful Roman emperors, magistrates, and Roman pro counsels, such as Julius Caesar and their Middle Ages descendants from the Venetian Oligarchy.  They make a case for the divine rights of ancient Kings to rule autocratically and to rule you today.


How does Venice and the Venetian princes relate to what is happening in the Ukraine today?  Peeling back the layers of the onion regarding history, historical families, historical forces discloses the founding kernel of 21 St century global economics, financial and political oligarchy rests with 13Th century Venice, and its sway over the silk and spice trade to China and the infiltration of the early Venetian City State by a powerful cadre of trading families established in the Caucasus region of Europe that became the Khazarian Empire.


  1. Khazaria. This empire dominated all trade, politics, and commerce in the Black Sea, in Tartary (think Ukraine), and in Constantinople and in later day Turkey. Russia’s Tsars’ fed up with Khazar banditry and predations mandated that the Khazars adopt Christianity, Judaism or Islam thinking that a moral based religion could tame their persistent banditry.  Khazaria elected to convert to Judaism.  However, this was duplicity and proved ineffective in taming Khazar bandits.  Finally, the Russian Tsar of the day provoked beyond endurance’ defeated the Khazars and wiped Khazaria out in the 8Th century.


  1. Russian Reaction The Russians based their justification to wipe Khazaria out on Khazar pervasive fraud, robbery, murder of Russians and Slav traders and the infiltration of Khazars into Russian dominions, who had assumed the identity of their murdered victims. The Russians perceived Khazaria as a robber state.  They also cited odious Khazar practices of killing youngsters, drinking their blood and eating their flesh as a revival of Baal worship.


  1. Khazar Reaction, the Rise of the Rothschild’s. The survivors fled to Europe and established themselves in Poland, Italy, Germany, Holland, Spain, and in England.  The survivors became the notorious Ashkenazi Jews of modern history.  Amschel Bauer, a German Ashkenazi Jew became the founding liege lord of the global Rothschild (Red Shield, the Bauer family logo and business icon) financial dynasty.


  1. THE RISE OF VENICE. Meanwhile, Khazarian agents infiltrated Italy and set themselves up to become the most powerful city state of the Middle Ages… Venice.  This political construct had its own mercenary army, and its navy that dominated trade in the Mediterranean and Black Sea.  Its traders came to control the spice and silk trade to China.  Subsequently, its agents controlled the trade in African slaves and drugs.  Venice ultimately came to dominate the Spanish silver and gold trade in the Americas.  Venice was the richest state in the world in history along with its rival the Vatican.


Thus, it was Venice that became the most powerful European city state with the most powerful navy, army and intelligence agency of its day.  Venice dominated the maritime, slave and narcotics trade between East and West far beyond the Middle Ages.  Venice also dominated another flourishing industry-publishing and the itinerant mercenary soldier for hire business.


The Venetians sold intelligence collected by their bankers and agents to the Mongols, who invaded the Crimea, The Ukraine, Poland and parts of Russia, and to local European despots and war lords in Central Asia.  The Venetians sought to penetrate and destroy Russia in revenge for wiping out Khazaria.  The Venetians created and established the Jesuit Order.  The Venetians/ Khazarians became the founding fathers of modern organized crime, the Mafia as we know it today.  These Venetians also founded the middle Ages occultist orders, such as the Spanish Alumbrados (Enlightened ones) that later gave rise to the Illuminati.


The Venetians refined statecraft to a high order resting on the warfare and intelligence based state.  The warfare based state was a predatory instrument aimed at gobbling up rich resources in other states and destroying their power by invasion, infiltration (think parasite), or by assassinating their leaders and replacing them with their agents.   Venetian intelligence dominated commerce, banking, and politics.  Venice sold intelligence to all comers.  Thus, all later day war was based on a centralized intelligence collection organization originated by Venice to anticipate likely or actual foes or rivals, or to determine resources and potential power that Venice could exploit.


Intelligence sold to rival factions caused chaos and opportunity for Venice and its ruling Doges (Oligarchs) to move in and pick up the pieces.  Consequently, through adept ambassadors, skilled intelligence operatives, and with the most powerful military forces in Europe at the time at its disposal, Venice destroyed any potential rival or Renaissance in the making.  They destroyed and sacked Persia, and Iraq, using the Mongols as their functionaries.  They destroyed the flourishing Italian Renaissance as they feared they could not control its forces to their exclusive benefit.


They curbed the Elizabethan period in England, spread the black plaque to rival states contesting their dominance, and they succeeded in destroying the amazing Florentine Renaissance.  They were the relentless foes of Niccolo Machiavelli, and Leonardo da Vinci.  They funded their agent, Martin Luther and his new religious order that upset the fabric of European civilization in the high middle Ages.   Thus, Luther was a Venetian agent aimed at the Catholic Church to destroy its influence and rival financial power.  Venetian philosophers also developed several incredibly evil schools of thought centering on destroying the economy of a state by free trade principles and by destroying entire races.   They anticipated Jeremy Bentham and Thomas Malthus, thus laying the foundation for the notorious school of modern day Western political/economic warfare and the dubious science of eugenics.


Note:  Niccolo Machiavelli associated with modern day deception, duplicity and evil hated Venice and exposed its agenda in the celebrated “The Prince” (largely misunderstood by modern readers).  It was not a treatise on how to apply evil in statecraft, but more to expose it.


Eventually, Venice attenuated through its numerous wars and constant upheavals.  Its ruling families however, remained in place in European royal families that they infiltrated into by either marriage, assassination, or by assuming the identities of persons they had murdered.


Today, the remnants of Venetian oligarchs are found in the so-called Black Nobility of Europe, the Black Pope of the Vatican and in the modern day crime families of the Mafia.  They are also present in the so-called Illuminati.  The descendants of the Venetian Princes, the Doges, powerful mercantile families controlling most of the world’s trade from Venice emerged subsequently with dominating positions in European commerce: shipping, maritime commerce, banking, food production, and publishing.  Thus the Rothschild dynasty became prime players in financing and controlling Europe’s monarchies and wars.  The Rothschild’s hold primary positions in the Bank of England and in the American Federal Reserve.


Note:  Many people think that American and world organized crime is an Italian phenomenon.  Actually, it is not.  Italians and other ethnic based gangsters such as the Irish, Polish, and later day Russian mobsters are fronts.  The real power rested with Ashkenazi Jews, who immigrated to America to plunder it.  The wise guys may have been Irish and Polish and Jewish mobsters, but the controlling head of the mob was the Ashkenazi Jew… Meyer Lansky-a dual American/Israeli citizen.


Note:  The Russians assisted the American revolutionists in their fight against the English Crown.  The Tsars knew who their enemy was.  They sent a fleet of warships to America to constrain England and threatened to base Russian outposts on the West coast to forestall the English Hudson Bay Company.  The Khazars never forgave Russia for assisting the Americans during the Revolution and during the American Civil War.  Moreover, Russia never permitted Khazarian banking institutions to penetrate Russia.


Note:  One reason for persistent demonizing of Vladimir Putin in the Western media is that Putin destroyed the Ashkenazi Jewish oligarchs’ grip on Russia after the dissolution of the Soviet Union.  The Russian and Ukrainian oligarchs’ were mostly Khazarian Jews in the Soviet civil service, the military, or in the banking/financial sector that robbed state industries during the chaotic dissolution of the USSR for themselves.  Putin jailed, or kicked out of Russia most of these oligarchs.  Oligarch interests in America and the West want him dead, so they can resume their depredations in Russia and in the Ukraine.


Note: It is interesting to note that the first publication put out after the fall of Mohammed Gaddafi was that the Rothschild bank in Libya was open for business!




Today, as a direct result of the Ukrainian crisis the world stands on a razor’s edge of a new world war.  Tens of thousands of Ukrainian civilians have been killed or injured in the war now raging in the Donbass region.  Significant areas of Donbass infrastructure have been totally destroyed.  The new airport (a 1 $Bn investment) is in ruins.  Many areas of the Donbass look like Stalingrad during WWII.


People are sick, dismayed, hungry, cold, and have few amenities.  Kiev and George Soros destroyed their lives and deliberately wages genocidal war on them.  An investigation into the UAFs targeting pattern shows that Kiev targets civilians, infrastructure, homes, hospitals, schools not military targets.  This is against the laws of war and remain war crimes.  The UAF is using mass weapons against civilian targets and are inflicting horrible life threatening or disfiguring casualties on Donbass region civilians.  The UAF has used banned cluster bombs and incendiaries to wage war on civilians.


Russia will not back down.  People in the Donbass and Donetsk area of the Ukraine will not concede to Kiev or back down.  They are determined to resist Kiev and the West.  They do not wish to integrate with Europe.  Despite the UN Charter allowing for self-determination, Kiev criminalized its own people and slated them for extermination for expressing views and rights they have under the UN Charter.


The Ukraine and a destabilized Russia offer huge financial incentives for western predatory vultures to create chaos in the Ukraine as a measure to bring down Russia.  This implies that the Ukrainian crisis is really aimed at Russia.


The Ukraine is fabulously wealthy.  It appears that Kiev is conceding to the corporate vultures in looting private land, in sowing precious farmland for the growth of Franken food GMOs, and in dismantling Ukrainian industry, so it can be outsourced to pals in China and elsewhere (think Walmart, China and buy American, and how America’s once vaunted industry has been reduced to tatters).


There is little doubt after examining confidential papers, hacks, and G. Soros’ own public admissions that Soros is a master criminal figure that aims at bringing OPEN SOCIETY reforms to targeted states so he can loot them at will.  Soros is responsible for the dreadful situation in the Ukraine, where death, severe injury, the loss of homes, the loss of peace and personal accumulations and the loss of humanity and hope for the residents of Donbass now prevails.


International criminal, George Soros appears to run the American government.  American officials appear to defer to Soros, and act as running dogs.  Soros’ record discloses that he is a dangerous psychopath, a traitor to his fellow Jews, a WWII war criminal, a demagogue of the Roman tradition.  In essence, Soros is a corrupter and despoiler of nations.  This man needs to be arrested and tried for conspiracy for committing crimes against humanity and in committing or facilitating the commission of war crimes in the Middle East and in the Ukraine.


The UN shows how ineffectual it really is.  It does nothing to stop the conflict in the Ukraine other than to record deaths and property losses.  There is no effective cease fire in the Ukraine.  There are no peacekeeping forces in the Ukraine.


  1. Putin recently put the West on notice. Russia will not back down.  The positioning of NATO forces and Western strategic weapons around its borders infers a military and economic cordon is being imposed on Russia.  The West is actively killing and maiming ethnic Russians in the Ukraine, and is actively interfering with Russian foreign policy in an area where it has had centuries of interaction.


If the West continues to ring Russia with strategic forces and weapons, and denies it opportunity to pursue its interests peacefully, then the world will likely explode into global conflict.  George Soros says this is necessary in order to build a more open world in the future…for that to happen the old world and its edifices must be destroyed.  In my opinion, it would be far better for George Soros and his vultures to be destroyed.


The following questions must be asked.  Why are the Ukrainian residents in the Donbass, and in the Crimea allowing themselves to be violently turned on each other?  Who is making them desperate to survive in a land of plenty?  Why are they killing each other, when they lived peacefully alongside each other for centuries and prospered together?




  1. This is a work in progress and Part 3 is now under development. I urge you to not rely on me, but to do your own research.
















In parts I and II we looked at some background issues germane to the present day Ukraine crisis, such as the long term enmity between the Russian Tsars and the Khazarian Empire, the destruction of that empire by Russia and the dispersal and infiltration of surviving Khazars into Europe and the rise of the Venetian State and the House of Rothschild and the enormous power acquired by a consortium of central banks under the Rothschild house banner.  We also looked at the rise of the EU, neo-Fascism, and the appearance now of the hidden Deep State apparatus as a shadow government paralleling the existing nominal government and the hidden Nazi past of America and its elites, such as Ford Motor Company, ITT, and IG Farben-America.  It still shocks Americans to find out that many of the name brand icon corporations in America had interlocking board of directors sitting on the board of Nazi companies.


We also reviewed the ongoing dismemberment of the fabulously rich Ukraine and the breakaway People’s Republic in Luhansk and in Donetsk and the yearning for the establishment of a new nation-state: Novorossiya, aligned with Moscow, which was the terminus of Russian foreign policy interests on the southern the periphery of Russia, under Empress Catherine II in the 18Th century.


The geopolitical and economic tensions inherent in the present day Ukrainian crisis is leading to extremely dangerous circumstances threatening world peace and setting the stage for World War III.  The question begs-WHY IS THIS HAPPENING?  The answer is relatively simple.  MONEY and long-term GEOPOLITICAL INTERESTS held by the global Khazarian cabal aimed at the permanent destruction of Russian and the Eastern Slavs.


Khazarian elite political and economic interests cemented in the West [London, Berlin, Paris, the Vatican and Rome, Washington DC] perceive that their ultimate quest in destroying Russia, its peoples and its power, as a bulwark in contesting the west’s global hegemony, and looting Russia’s enormous wealth for themselves is now possible.  The destruction and looting of Russia, the biggest and arguably the wealthiest country in the world is the capstone to the processes they set into motion some 500 years ago that was aimed at bringing down the Romanovs and Russia.  End of story.  We can dispense with all the arcane rationales and academic mumbo jumbo.


Russia and the Eastern Slavs since the rise of international bankers beginning with the Lombards’ in Italy in the Middle Ages, the creation of economic centered regimes in the West under the relentless forces of mercantilism, Imperialism, and successor ideologies, such as neoliberalism, and the appearance of the transnational corporation as a rival to the state are considered as an impediment to Western and cabal interests in dominating the world.  This view led to a deadly game between Russia and imperialist interests beginning in the early 19th century.




Since the rise of Russia under the Tsars, the Hanseatic Mercantile League, the entrenchment of mercantilism as a regional and global economic driving force in the Middle Ages, combined with the spread of the Russian Orthodox Christian religion offsetting the power of Rome, and the burgeoning power of Russia to contest western encroachments and penetrations of vital strategic territory, trades routes, and resources found with the boundaries of the Russian Empire tensions between Russia and the West to obtain or defend these vast riches has led to an ever deepening struggle between Moscow, and London.


The prize was access to Central Asia’s resources, the spice and silk trade to China, and India.  India was subjugated by the English and mostly controlled by arguably the first transnational corporation—The British East India Company, an English trade and government services company (Today we see modern day equivalents, such as Walmart, and Academi (formerly Blackwater), and (United Fruit) Chiquita Bananas, the House of Saud (Saudi Aramco) which hold monopolies in consumable goods, food products, energy, and in state security operations.  The British East India Company dominated trade in spices, hardwoods, drugs and in slave labor, principally from East Africa (Madagascar), and saltpeter–the vital ingredient in making gunpowder.


Thus, Russia’s drive and need for warm water ports to support her navy and commerce, her proximity to Afghanistan and to India, her occupation of geopolitically important Siberia and Crimea and her latent military power led to a bitter and deadly game for dominance of the trade routes located in Central and Eastern Asia, and India–the crowning jewel of the British Empire.  The game for dominance led to several proxy wars between Russia and England in Afghanistan and a full scale war in the Crimea during the 19Th century.


The Crimean war ostensibly began over Russia’s desires to protect Orthodox Christians in the Middle East (sound familiar?) and Turkey’s, Britain’s and France’s suspicions of Russia’s expansion from the Crimea into Anatolia and the Balkans.  The war did not end well for Russia.  She sued for peace in 1856.  The Treaty of Paris forbade the presence of Russian warships in the Black Sea, but Russia gained the right to tend to Orthodox Christians in the Balkans and in the Middle East.  The rivalry between Russia and the British Empire intensified all throughout the 19Th and 20Th centuries until the Romanov dynasty fell from power in Russia.


The existence of deep historical tensions and episodic states of war between the Slavs in the east and the money power concentrated in the West impeded the development of Russia.  English and later date American Imperialism aimed at constraining the development and expansion of the Russia Empire.  A compelling argument can be made that the Crimean war involving Turkey, France, England and Russia, Russia’s impediment to the advance of Tatary (the Golden Horde in the Ukraine), the later day Ottoman outpost centered in Crimea, the destruction of Ottoman (Muslim) military power in Europe at the gates of Vienna by the Poles (a Slavic race), Russia’s involvement in World War I and II, and finally, the Russian Revolution did not happen by chance.


Russia’s closest neighbor to the South is the Ukraine.  Geopolitically, we can argue that the Ukraine is the gatekeeper to the Balkans, to the Mediterranean and Asia via the Black Sea.  Thus the Ukraine occupies a vital position related to Russian and Slavic national security.  The Ukraine and Russia were subjugated to a succession of invasions by Mongols, Ottoman Turks, and the Germans invaded Russia twice in the 20Th century.  Consequently, this led to the historical drive by the Russians to acquire as much buffer territory as possible to forestall possible invaders.  In military terms, an invader cannot destroy a power that has sufficient territory to retreat within to rebuild military power.  Napoleon and Hitler should have known that.


III. THE GREAT GAME II-THE NEO LIBERAL PROJECT.  To better understand the vital position occupied by the Ukraine and to fathom what is actually happening there now, especially in contextualizing the machinations of the Rothschild banking empire, and its front man in the United States, George Soros and their stooges in Kiev we need to look at the so-called Neo Liberal Project, the neo Conservative Movement and the Project for the New American Century.  All of them have bearing on the tensions, the possibility for wide scale war between East and West, and the breakup of Russia, its dismemberment and the occupation of the Ukraine by imperialist oriented neo Fascist forces.



  1. Neo Liberalism. Reduced to its essentials, the West’s neo liberal project is a set of economic policies aimed at resources and land grabs making the poor poorer and the rich, richer.  That’s it.  Liberalism has several political trajectories, such as encouraging pluralism, diversity, and the rights of minorities, children and women.  Those are lofty and admirable goals.  However, the real goal of political liberalism is to offset political revolts and social conflict between the masses and the elites.  Thus, Democrats in the US and English Liberals champion liberalism as the great moderator between haves and have nots, when it is nothing of the sort.  It just sounds good.  Liberalism is progressive, while Conservatism as a movement is a stick stuck in the mud going nowhere.


Old school Liberals originated in England during the 18Th century.  They are associated the Adam Smith School of Economics, centering on the “economic imperialism” construct of free trade, eliminations of protective tariffs, the elimination of any barriers to commerce, and non-interference of government in commerce.  Thus, neo liberals hail the outsourcing of entire industries to areas where the lowest labor costs can be found, the elimination of borders, globalism, and concentration of economic power in the hands of elites.  Conservatives have no problem with the tenets of economic liberalism and the neo liberal project.  In fact, they are part of it.


Under this construct you will find the process of “democratization,” containment, and globalization, and the use of soft-power as a political and military strategy aimed at Russia, its allies, and long-term trading partners.


  1. Democratization. Is the evolution of nominal democratic processes in government of states participating in the neo liberal project as so-called democratic states are perceived by inclination, and by mutual self-interest not to wage war on fellow democratic states.  Think of the economic grounded neo liberal project as a global gravy train.  The last thing elites behind the scenes want is conflict between states to derail the gravy train by war, revolution, and social conflict—that is unless they occasion it.  Therefore, if the architects of the neo liberal project need to overthrow a government, assassinate opposition leaders, and cause a revolution and social chaos to advance their interests, so be it.


  1. Containment. This is a political, economic, and military strategy aimed at isolating a recalcitrant state and depriving it of economic opportunity, and constraining its inherent military power and the ability to project power by ringing it with a series of powerful military bases (think the Cold War encirclement of Russia, and war by proxy in Russia’s spheres of influence).  Economic containment is achieved by waging economic warfare, the imposition of high tariffs on goods and services, barring the sale of the targeted state’s goods in domestic markets and excluding it from favorable trade terms, and aiming economic alliances against it (think Club of Rome and the Common Market).  Military containment aims at limiting state military power and ability to project power in the international arena, by ringing the targeted state with military bases on its borders, and aiming military alliances against it (think NATO and ASEAN).


  1. Globalism. The third leg of the West’s quadruped of measures aimed at Russia centers on globalism. Essentially, shrinking resources, sinking profits, and deteriorating regional markets motivated transnational corporations to globalize the capitalist economy and call for centralization of regulatory and enforcement mechanisms in a global government.  Globalization centers on destroying the nation state, state sovereignty, and state economies by outsourcing domestic industry, the sedimentation of labor, and the elimination of borders, and cultures deemed retrograde or capable of opposing globalism and eliminating self-government and self-determination.


  1. Soft Power. The fourth leg centers on an arcane concept called soft power. The ancient Chinese well understood the concept of soft power.  In their perceptions, soft power represented the elusive quality of culture, language, arts, manners, and spiritualism as equally important to hard or material power resting on gunboats, firearms and swords, and military formations.  Essentially, as a tool of diplomacy, soft power implies obtaining state goals by attraction and sharing commonalities rather than by coercion.  Thus, a state’s foreign policy, the righteousness of culture and religion gain power by impressing and persuading others that the state deserves legitimacy and respect from other states.  Thus, the money power cabal branches in Tel Aviv, Rome, London, Berlin and Washington has enlisted academics, authors, actors, musicians, and peddlers of bullshit to attract favorable publicity and world legitimacy to the need for globalism, the neo liberal project by using mind control techniques, slick advertising, and the promotion of trending ideas with youth (think Madonna’s music and antics).  A prime example was the hidden propagandizing effort within Radio Free America during the Cold War.

British and American Rock Music represents another venue that attracted millions of kids around the world.  Soft power may be diametrically opposed to Mao’s concept of power rising out of a gun barrel, but to the cognoscenti it is equally powerful (think Mahatma Ghandi, Martin Luther King and the use of non-violence as a political tool).

There are some caveats to consider about soft power.  Soft power to be successful depends on the side you wish to attract allowing you to do so.  It does not work with Nazi or Stalinist hardliners.

What is interesting is that V. Putin is successfully using concepts of Soft Power as an adjunct tool of Russian diplomacy to the horror of the cabal.  The result is a pounding demonization of Russia, by the West because Putin is running circles around the West, especially the Obama Administration perceived by many as irrelevant and oafish.  Think “No fair shooting my bullets back at me!”).


  1. AMERICAN VALUES AND CONSERVATISM. Let’s be clear about American Conservatism and its values.  There are deep contradictions inherent in American Conservatism as a political movement that originated in the 18Th century and  as perceived by the neo Conservative movement today in the 21St century.  The original American Conservative movement’s thematic architecture rests on the following concepts.


  1. The New Nation-A Constitutional Republic. The American Revolution and the emergence of America as the “new nation” espousing radical ideas of liberty, self-fulfillment, entrepreneurship, egalitarianism, a republican form of government and respect for others and Christianity was a shock to world elites, especially to those in the Khazarian cabal in European royalty. Thus the concept of America is grounded in boldness, soaring imagination, hard work and thrift, and in notions of exceptionalism.  America was different because its people were different.  Nobody had seen the like before on the world stage.  Americans were willing to break the mold and chains of the old world holding them back in deference to royal prerogatives.  Americans were masters of their own fate and deferred to nobody.


Note:  America was never conceived to be a democracy where rights are nominal privileges, and where mobs prevail, and dictatorship reigns (Unfortunately, today, Americans have lost sight of who they are, and have fallen away from their values).


  1. America’s Unique Mission: America was mission oriented. The mission rested on transforming the world by implementing the above values and becoming a positive force for good.  Thus, by right of the American Revolution’s success, America gained enormous soft power to be emulated.  America went where other nations feared to tread.  This sense of mission is fundamental to understanding America and Americans because the mission makes America nominally superior to other nations.  This concept of self-anointed mission made America a nation to be feared by autocratic regimes.  It immediately attracted the attention of the cabal, which set into motion destructive forces to destroy the new nation.


  1. Free Markets and Freedom of the Seas. America espouses the so-called open and free market process of laissez faire economics (implying that government shouldn’t unnecessarily interfere in business), the elimination of foreign imposts and tariffs, and supposedly markets are open to all (exclusion of monopolies). Moreover, there is allowance for competition to eliminate the weak, the stupid and the unfit from commerce (a very important distinction from present day economics whereby the transnational corporation props itself up and shields itself from possible failure by the mechanism of corporate welfare.  In other words, the people are compelled to bail it out of economic trouble.  Yes, it is welfare for the elite, and the people cannot see it for what it is–robbery on a grand scale).


Thus the market is perceived to be self-regulating and the unfit will go bankrupt and be driven from the market.   American originated as a trading nation with a vast navy and merchant fleet.  Thus, American success depended on the freedom of the seas to ply trade with the world.  America therefore, would use force (and has several times) to gain freedom to trade upon the seas.


These values and the success of American inventors and entrepreneurs were truly remarkable.  Americans enjoyed a stable government wedded to the Republican form of government, helped each other, and pulled themselves up by their own efforts, and practiced an informal Christianity.  American freedoms, energy and willingness to stand up to international bullies attracted millions of new citizens in one of the most remarkable immigration efforts in world history.  That soft power attraction to become an American was the real secret of American power, as it attracted the best minds and characters to come to America to be citizens.




Americas many freedoms and successful political and economic foundations in comparison to their downtrodden, abused, and impoverished brothers in Europe served as a beacon of hope and optimism to the rest of the world.  However, over the years they became rich and arrogant, a trend immediately seized upon by the cabal’s agents in America.


Americans became oblivious to their past, their moral foundations, and the really hard work inherent in preserving their freedoms.  Under the artful cabal practitioners of demoralization, political and subversive warfare Americans became corrupted and fell away from their roots.  American demoralization and the process of covert subversive, political, and cultural warfare began in earnest with the Cold War and the horrible war in Vietnam.


  1. THE NEO CONSERVATIVE MOVEMENT AND THE PROJECT FOR THE NEW AMERICAN CENTURY. Within a span of some fifty years, Americans no longer remembered, who they were, and lost their own self-respect and the respect of others.  “The Ugly American” became a particularly sore topic with American observers, critics, and with the rest of the world.  What caused this?  In a nutshell: sex, drugs, and rock and roll music set loose on America by the cabal’s Tavistock School of Human Relations, Stanford Research Institute, the Frankfurt School centered in the University of Chicago, The Ford Foundation, The Council on Foreign relations, and the global criminal mafia (controlled by the cabal).


By the 1960s, America was the new bully in the world, unilaterally using its power to get its way by overthrowing what it perceived to be obstructionist regimes all over the world. This was achieved by the covert infiltration into America of fascist tenets by European and American fascists ( and Nazis), the power of the cabal’s financial institutions pursuing the neoliberal project, and by artful and deceptive camouflage.


Fascism hid behind liberalism and so-called democracy.  Republican values (individual rights and limited government) were eschewed as soft, stupid, retrograde and irrelevant with the emergence of the homosexual, the feminist, the abortion, the black power, and drug agenda.  The Truman Administration’s importation of massive numbers of Nazi war criminals into American society, and the unsettling specter of a nuclear armed Communist Russia gobbling up states in Eastern Europe accelerated the de facto Nazification of America.


So, what is the Project for the New American Century?  In a word, it is neo fascism and the use of unbridled military power to gain political and economic power in global markets.   In many areas it parallels the neo liberal project.  Some of its features rest on–


  • Aggressive U.S. foreign policies
  • American global leadership to be supreme in a unipolar orbit
  • Preponderant American military strength
  • The use of military, moral and economic power to spread so-called democratic ideals (we are NOT a democracy but a Constitutional Republic) in the world
  • Creating a police state at home to further American hegemony
  • Waging war on crime, poverty, terrorism to spread American hegemony
  • Invading and destroying so-called terrorist supporting states (Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Egypt, and now Syria)
  • Using Islam as a weapon aimed at Europe, America and at peaceful elements in the Muslim world. Sharia law is to be weaponized and globalized (keep in mind the Nazis originated and used the Muslim Brotherhood to further their purpose in the Muslim world.  Islamofascism is a reality of modern day politics)
  • The PNAC has roots in the Khazarian money cabal operating in America as some of its principal spokespersons are Ashkenazi Jews like William Kristol, Robert Kagan, Paul Wolfowitz and others (incidentally, Victoria Nuland is the wife of PNAC honcho, Robert Kagan).
  • Essentially the PNAC is not that much different from the neo liberal project and many of the same actors can be found in both movements


These notions center on international FASCISM as the foundation for a new global order.


  1. DEEP CONTRADICTIONS. These notions are at deep odds with true American conservative values and have set the stage for deep economic and social turbulence, and possibly revolution in America and a new global war.


  1. THE DESTRUCTION OF RUSSIA. In concluding this section, the West, especially the vested money power has sought the destruction of Russia, the elimination of the Tsars, and the breakup of the present day Russian state for at least five hundred years.  Destabilizing the Ukraine, advancing NATO’s military power within the Russian security periphery and co-opting former Warsaw Pact states by admitting them into the European Union is viewed as the perfect opportunity to break up Russia through the Ukraine morass. However, to accomplish this, the cabal had to first demoralize America, and to destroy American values to co-opt Americans to the emergence and desirability of a world government, and to accept the emergence of fascism in lieu of Republicanism.


Let’s take a look at some of the actors associated with the Ukraine mess.


  1. THE ACTORS IN THE NEW GAME (But Essentially the Old Game). The main actors in the Ukraine morass are as follows–


(1.) The United States (Obama Administration)

(2.) Germany (Merkel Administration)

(3.) England (David Cameron)

(4.)  France (Francoise Hollande)

(5.)  Russia (Vladimir Putin)

(6.) The Ukraine (Oligarchs: Poroshenko and Yatsenyuk and Zionist agent, Dmitry Yarosh).


Additionally, behind the scenes we also have the usual suspects exerting enormous influence: The Council on Foreign Relations and the CIA, and its British equivalent the British Foreign Office and MI6.  Moreover, we have the secretive American Council on National Policy, the equally reclusive Bilderberg Association, and the World Economic Forum centered in Davos, Switzerland.


What do the actors want or stand to gain in The Ukraine?


  1. Vladimir Putin and Russia. Russia essentially wants the EU out of its sphere of influence and NATO out of its southern periphery.  Thus, the Ukraine and Russia’s long historical association with the Crimea and the Ukraine should remain within the Russian orbit.  Putin has repeatedly said that Russia has no ambitions in outright annexation, but wants a customs and trade union.  This implies a mutually beneficial economic and trade association.  It also presents stability on Russia’s vulnerable southern periphery.  A customs and trade union with Ukraine presents Russia with access to the Ukraine’s gas fields, heavy industry and agriculture.  Russia’s adroit annexation of the Crimea was a major slap in the face to the US and to Obama, who is still reeling with the neoliberal faction and conservatives as a result.  Putin admitted that the Ukraine was an economic basket case.  He posits that the best solution is for the Donetsk region and for Russian ethnics in the Ukraine to become an autonomous entity within the Ukraine republic.


  1. Obama and the United States. The United States seeks to limit Russian influence and control in the Crimea and in the Ukraine. Washington seeks to admit The Ukraine to NATO.  It seeks to gain purchase and leverage for American transnational corporations like john Deere and Monsanto and Dow Chemical.  American corporations want to deindustrialize the Ukraine and obtain exclusive access to its rich agriculture and access to its gas fields.  Thus, Washington seeks to destabilize the Ukraine with its European partners to offset Russian influence and to set the stage for deep social and economic turbulence to cross the border and become rooted in Russia, thereby wreaking havoc in Russia.  Thus, the cabal behind the scenes is using Ukrainian chaos and civil war as the infectious agents for a future Russian destabilization, breakup and wider civil war to destroy Russia.  Contextually, there are serious tensions in Russia.  The country is vast, almost too large to govern effectively and has suffered terribly since the breakup of the Soviet Union.  There are Tsarist elements in opposition with communists and even fascist bent nationalists striving to gain power in Russia.  Thus, deep political, economic and cultural and racial tensions simmer under the surface.


  1. England and David Cameron. London and its American partner, especially the American oligarchs on Wall Street are united in purpose.  They want the Ukraine for themselves and to separate it from Russian influence.  Period.  England and Washington together decry the Putin doctrine as destabilizing and dangerous for the world.  Yet, the Anglo-American establishment is pursuing the very same policies it attributes to Russia as dangerous to world peace.


  1. Germany and Angela Merkel. Germany has economic interests in the UkraineThere are many ethnic Germans living in the Ukraine (descendants of the Volga German farmers brought in to make the Ukraine bloom by the Tsars).  Germany prior to WWII fostered a virulent Nazism in the Ukraine.  Germany enlisted many Ukrainian thugs into the Waffen SS.  Most of the wanton killing of Jews in the Ukraine were committed by Ukrainians serving in SS Einsatzkommandos waging ethnic cleansing campaigns in Russia and in the Ukraine.  Nazi Germany sought to sever the Ukraine and Chechnya from Russia.  Today, the fascist elements in Germany seek to continue to exert political and economic power in the Ukraine at Russia’s expense.  Germany recently declared Russia an enemy of state, and is mobilizing its armed forces for a possible war against Russia.  Merkel admitted that the conflict is really about Russia and not the Ukraine per se.   Yet she adds confusion when stating that a military solution to the crisis is not possible, yet she enmifies Russia and puts Germany’s armed forces on a war footing.


  1. France and Francoise Hollande. President Hollande and France appear more neutral in the revanchist Great Game playing out now in Eastern Europe.  France, is of course, upset with the Crimea annexation.  However, France seeks a nurturing policy with Russia and not outright confrontation.  France has good reason to remind itself of Russian military power, especially after Napoleon’s disastrous misadventure in Russia.  France is more perceptive in arguing that the West needs Russia in combating global Islamic terrorism.  France successfully negotiated the Georgian crisis and appears to be more even handed than the Anglo American establishment.  France wants an end to the crisis, and is willing to play a supporting role, but reserves the right to play its own role in Russo-Franco affairs outside the orbit of the European Union (this is characteristic of the French.  DeGaulle pursued independent French policies outside of NATO, discombobulating the Americans and Germans in the alliance).  France sees many advantages in pursuing a bilateral military agreement with Russia.  Russia is modernizing its armed forces and France has opportunity to sell to Russia state of the art military armaments.




A compelling case can be made that the Khazarian empire lives on in Western banking concerns, financial institutions, and in the nascent global government to be-nominally represented by the United Nations along with its adjunct banking, security organizations and cultural movements supported by its subset actors in the EU, the World Bank, and the International Monetary Fund, and the Office of Security and Cooperation in Europe, and its military arm, NATO.  Moreover, the UN and global oriented elites are supported by another cast of actors that few know about.  These are the Council of National Policy, the Council on Foreign Relations, the British Council, the Club of Rome, and the notorious Bilderberg Association and finally edifices such as the World Economic Forum, and the Trilateral Commission.


A very compelling case can be made that the edifices of the emerging New World Order are fascist in nature.  The global government will be authoritarian and brutal as the Nazis, fascists and Stalinist were in the 20th century.  Economic determinations by the transnational corporations will usher in a new statecraft and actors on the world scene.  The transnational corporations will be as powerful as states.  They will have huge treasuries supported and maintained by the edifices of corporate welfare.  They will have their own private armies and intelligence services.  They will have their own private police.  They will have their own diplomats and civil service to rule in conclaves set aside for them by agreement with the world government to be.  Thus, the world government in the making is basically being established to accommodate transnational corporations and not the people of the world.


Resistance to this evolution will be ruthlessly crushed by military, economic and police power.  Make no mistake about it.  There will be no opting out.  Either join or be crushed.  If you resist you will be declared a criminal and or terrorist and dealt with by corporate armies and police.  We are already seeing this take place in the Ukraine where PMC, such as Academi (Blackwater) and others are being used by fascist oligarchs to crush resistance to the Poroshenko and Yatsenuk regime put into power by the EU and the United States.


The new actors will be the same old actors, following a rebranding of the old schemas for obtaining, maintaining, and expanding power in the world.  A new speak will emerge centered on notions of the old speak.  Slavery will be freedom.  Subjugation will be opportunity.  Happiness will be misery and so on.


Russia is the end game target of this process now set into motion in the Ukraine.  The Ukraine is a subset process, a weapon resting on social chaos, economic dislocations and misery and de facto genocide that is posed to spill over into Russia per se.  However, Russia and the Russian people are blessed in that they have a remarkably talented President leading them.   V. Putin so far has not committed any major mistakes.  He is the most gifted and talented major politician on the world state today.  Putin does not talk down to people, especially to his own people.  He does not mince words.  Moreover, he is a convincing debater and skillfully uses Russia’s own considerable soft power to attract and impress global audiences.


Many Americans admire Putin and wish they had a leader like him.  It is often heard in the American liberty community that the Russians got Putin and the Americans, on the other hand got the “bummerman.”  This may imply opportunity for fair-minded Russians and their American counterparts that opportunity for open and constructive dialogue still exists that can lead to peace and mutual profit.  But that door is closing fast,  Putin is running out of options with the steady advance of NATO to Russia’s security periphery.


Putin’s diplomatic skills and Russia’s latent economic and military power are offsetting the West’s aim at unipolarity.  That makes Putin and Russia a target for obliteration.  The Ukraine morass is now being weaponized and aimed at Russia with the expectation that the fundamental weaknesses of Russia: (a.) huge land mass making it inefficient to administer, (b.) simmering long-held ethnic tensions, (c.) outdated industrial capacity and foundations, (d.) political tensions and differences among social groups can be used as silent weapons to wage a quiet war on Russia that will lead to Russia splitting apart along political, ethnic lines that will cause a new Russian Revolution that can be controlled by cabal agents.  At some point the Khazarian cabal will step in and carve up Russia, eliminating Russia and the Eastern Slavs as the main obstacle to their self-admitted objective of carving up the world and eliminating anyone they don’t like.


Does this drama and cast of characters make the people of the world helpless and without power?  NO.  In fact, they have all the power they need to stop this.  To do this, they will have to borrow from the example of the American Revolution, from the Spanish Civil War, and from the people of the Donbass region now facing extinction.  These examples in opposing tyrants infer that they must realize that they are in a war with a global power aiming at stealing their lives, children, resources and countries.  They must realize that this power is ruthless and has set off two world wars, countless regional conflicts, that the cabal establishes dictators, and has killed millions of people.


All they have to do is to refuse to become slaves.  To be a slave people must be concede to become one.  To not be a slave people must acquire weapons and know how to use them.  The county militia system established in America, used in Finland and in Switzerland and now seen at work in the Donbass region has enormous deterrent power.  And beyond military skills, military formations and military weapons people of the world have another enormously powerful weapon at their disposal-SOFT POWER and the ability to reach beyond governments and political hacks to talk to each other in finding common ground and mutually acceptable mechanisms to settle differences without the need for war and endless conflict.


This rests on people putting the governments of the world on notice that a new sheriff is in town-implying that the people are their own sheriffs, generals, and diplomats—that the people have the real power and that they are the real peacemakers, and peacekeepers.


If they can do this, then the world does not need a United Nations, a NATO, or people like the bummerman, or George Soros… If they don’t do this and don’t unite and come together in one voice acknowledging that evil people exist in the world, and that armies and statesmen cannot deal with them until the people become engaged, then it is all over.  That is how close the great game has gotten to the finish.  Either good prevails or evil does.  There it is.


The people in the Ukraine’s Donbass region know this, and have elected not to bow down.  Putin knows this, and is not backing down.  Many good Americans and other people of the world know this, or they would not be throwing bombs at the regimes that occasioned the Ukraine atrocity and horror.  They would not be coming from all over the world, and joining the militias in the Donbass and risking their lives, and or imprisonment in their native countries.  Father Boris and his children in Donetsk know this.  Father Boris, his children, and the militiamen in Donbass are resplendent icons for liberty, and happiness in the world.


Father Boris recently talked to the American people and asked for consideration and fairness.  We Americans need to respond in kind and let him know that he and his kids are not alone.




Finally, let me step off my academic high horse, and revert to being an ornery American and add some personal comments.  What we are seeing today in the Ukraine is another Mexico in the making.  In fact, Mexico, and what happened there during the Mexican Revolution is an excellent metaphor for representing events in the Ukraine.  The Mexican Revolution and the actors on the scene were splendidly reprised in Sam Peckinpah’s superb if bloody moral story… THE WILD BUNCH.


And for the cabal and its rotten acolytes’, the message reverberating from the opposition to their schemes in the Donbass is clear-just like it was to General Mapache in the hard-hitting film “The Wild Bunch.”


“THE WORLD IS ABOUT TO GO GET ANGEL.” Just like Pike and the crusty Wild Bunch outlaws did in old Mexico back in the day, when they decided to risk their lives and stolen gold to rescue their companion, Angel held in captivity and hideously tortured by the brutal Federale General Mapache.


Pike and his outlaw gang had their fill of Mexican booze, whores, and festivals.  It was time to leave Mexico and to enjoy their stolen gold-stolen by General Mapache from downtrodden Mexican peons.  But something was missing.  They did not have Angel with them.  So, as they were saddling up to leave, Pike commented “Let’s go get Angel.”  That resonated with the tough Wild Bunch.  To a man they gunned up, turned around, and went to get Angel.  To the Wild Bunch, Angel’s life and freedom was more important than gold or their lives.


Pike and the Wild Bunch didn’t live.  But neither did General Mapache and his minions.  End of story.  To be free sometimes requires sacrifices of life, liberty, and personal wealth.  That is the only deterrent the people in the world really have against cold-blooded monsters like George Soros.  Soros doesn’t want to be killed, or to go to jail for life for his crimes, or to have his ill-gotten wealth stripped out of his hands.  That is why he and his kind hide behind armies and hack politicians like bummer.  But that did not stop Pike and the Wild Bunch from taking on the Federales and General Mapache.


It’s not stopping the people in Donbass.  Sorry George Soros, but your days like the Mexican warlord, Mapache are numbered.  This drives in the point again.  To be a slave, people must consent to be slaves.  If people do not consent to be slaves, then the slave master architects of slave regimes in whatever guise they choose to operate in are at risk and their new world order scams are doomed to fall apart.


It’s not stopping militia Colonel Givi, or militia commander “Motorola” and his warriors.  It’s not stopping the Spaniards, or the Russians, or Englishmen, the Irish, Indians, or Germans, nor the Chechens and Afghanis, or Texan, Russell B. Bentley from joining in on the good fight.


The New World Order Crowd are in deep, deep doo doo now.





Quintus Dias


22 September, 20016